Wireguard poor performance. · an undulating space .

Wireguard poor performance Like most benchmarks, the performance you I have tried wireguard performance: - PFsense wireguard saturates my client with 600mbit/s - OPNsense wireguard reaches only 40mbits with 100% cpu on OPNsense. Ubuntu 22. MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. I vaguely understand why latency would affect the tcp version of the iperf test I ran (something something retransmits), but since I read wireguard uses udp, I didn't think latency would contribute to the difference in speed. For a typical ‘SOHO MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. Up to date Raspbian (apt full-upgrade) Wireguard 0. iNet GL-MT6000 “Flint 2” WiFi 6 router, I had a look at the package content and the hardware design with a teardown of the FreeBSD® and pfSense® software release 2. You might want to try a low MTU of like 1200 and see what you get - then you can bump up the MTU until you find your upper threshold. Flexibility and Customization The project is designed to be flexible, allowing for customization of key parameters such as CPU core allocation and specific WireGuard version settings. Reply reply More replies. What we see is that the speed goes from high rates of 200-300 Mbit/s down to the (presumably) minimum of 6-7 Mbit/s. Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly Hello everyone, (Edit: See the replies as I have found an answer) I’ve set up a WireGuard site-to-site connection between my house and my relatives. But as soon as I reboot the pfSense VM, the performance drops However, it seems that when connecting from other devices via WireGuard, the speed drops significantly: 5G connection - ~1200mbps, 5G via WireGuard tunnel - ~120mbps. MTU is pretty low with SSTP, so I'd imagine fragmentation maybe why your seeing slower speeds. Running opnsense 23. When I run an iperf test over the Symptom: I manage to get good performance with above settings: 1 Gbps download / 400 Mbps upload. On the 10 servers I tested, I found that the Windscribe app (Wireguard protocol) gets about x3 times faster download speeds. In summary, here's an Ookla speedtest from a client being routed out through the wireguard tunnel. I have 1Gbps symmetric fiber connection. Speed is great, I'd say saturates around 85% of my base speed (939mbps). Latency is a complex question, but assuming no significant load, it shouldn't be overly bad in user As an aside, I also configured up wireguard on the same disks. Regards. 5gbit of my Infrastructure as Code in 2024: Why It's Still So Terrible Dec 26th 2024 7:00am, by Joab Jackson Defining Low Data Loss, Downtime Tolerances in Kubernetes Pros and Cons of OpenVPN and WireGuard. Is there anything obvious that could cause Re: Poor WireGuard performance on RB5009 Post by ivicask » Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:53 am I can confirm the 1350 MTU, had weird issues where internet speeds where good for me but SMB traffic was super slow, droping mtu to 1350 fixed it. When setting VPN directly on the router the Download Poor file transfer performance over WireGuard Poor file transfer performance over WireGuard. The community driven WireGuard synthetic benchmark, with results for popular targets is on wg-bench on github and the forum. ps. While the state of SQM does not seem to affect vpnc, the wireguard bandwidth drops from 31MBit/s to 21MBit/s when it's enabled. As soon as i enable wireguard, connection speed drops to 1-2mbps in upload and download, no matter where the traffic comes from (LTE, public hotspots, my I've setup a Wireguard server (running on Ubuntu server 20. I High performance hit from using Tailscale (Wireguard) #659. 19, so it should be in the kernel. Well there is: wireguard-go-0. Switch to Wireguard? I have an old PC with a 4th Gen i5-4770S, a 2. Executive Summary I'm having an issue with very poor performance in one particular direction through a Wireguard tunnel between two FreeBSD 13. 6 posts • Page 1 of 1. Connecting from the wireguard client host is fast. Quick links. But no, it's the typical groupthink Wireguard / bad performance after reboot, if running together with OpenVPN. Both peers in the Wireguard network do about the same amount of heavy lifting in terms of encryption, so speeds in server vs client mode shouldn’t be much different. I have tried bigger and smaller MTUs with no meaningful change. That said I use PIA which includes wireguard. As per the MTU value of 1320, I know it's not optimal, but that is the default MTU proposed by my provider (AirVPN), and was "good enough" to highlight the issue and narrow the possible cause (didn't want to mess with too many parameters): better have a MTU that is too low than too high, as far as I understand. Symptom: I can route WAN (internet) traffic through my pfSense firewall via full-tunnel Wireguard connection from remote peers at nearly full speed of my remote internet connection, i. Our program uses the script mode on MITMProxy to create a custom request based on the request from a All other things being equal I'm getting maybe 1/3 to 1/2 the performance throughput of my OVPN server connections. My processor can be entirely idle with nothing running and I'll still have a speed drop. As soon as I switch to the wireless network connected to the same vpn-tunneled WireGuard expert Tailscale has achieved a breakthrough in the performance of WireGuard-based VPNs, resulting in significant improvements in throughput. e. I'm running OPNsense in Proxmox in a router on a stick setup. My The OS makes a big difference in performance if it comes to Wireguard. went from 1280 to 1420, but it had very little effect on the performance. Terrible performance for port forwarding via WireGuard on Cloud Hosted MikroTik router. M. Although I closely followed the guidance of this blog post as well as the OpenWrt forum currently our network is barley usable. Check cpu usage on the server during the speed test. 2_1 and the issue persists, but also Wireguard-go Though again, the Pi is a poor performer and not a good test subject for raw VPN performance testing. By weirdcrap January 20, 2021 in General Support. But I thought it would be useful feedback. All systems and software involved are up to date. 4, I have the wireguard client with a tunnel setup for Mullvad. Tried updating to 24. Secondly, OpenVPN supports a multitude of cipher suites. I am fairly new to this, so bear with me. 5 times faster, and with regards to ping speeds Wireguard is about x5 times faster than Windscribe. Modified 4 years ago. Docker doesn't directly add overhead to WireGuard itself; WireGuard is still done in-kernel. Some have wondered “how fast” this implementation is. I have a router which has SQM enabled on it's WAN interface. Osswald et al. I've noticed enormous performance difference compared to CBC on my IPsec/StrongSwan setup. CPU usage is never more than 10-15% under the heaviest load and I can max out the 2. The performance analysis is conducted using the iperf tool, which offers reliable network throughput measurements. It’s dynamic IP, so I use DDNS to point to the endpoint in the client configuration. Posts: 4 Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2024 12:21 pm. I should be able to pull around 100Mbps on an iPerf speedtest but the best i can do is 50Mbps. Additionally, pings to the wireguard server itself have inconsistent latency, and are dropped at a rate of 1 ICMP packet/~600 pings. My goal is essentially remote management and safe surfing when on public wifi's. tdabasinskas just joined Posts: 3 Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2023 11:34 am. I believe docker NATs traffic, which uses CPU time, detracting from the CPU time available for WireGuard to use. . WireGuard: Faster, thanks to Symmetrical connections enjoyed by both PEERS under WireGuard will under excellent circumstance provide 90% or better performance of the subscribed bandwidth assuming peers are capable. To recap: server-to-internet WireGuard performance is fine at 1Gbps. This website uses cookies. Both server and client are Gl inet AX1800 routers. u/MetricT, you should switch OpenVPN to AES-GCM and run the tests once more MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. I have a wireguard tunnel on an interface running on my pfsense 2. The VM has a single 10g virtio nic. From another VM on the same proxmox server when routing through OPNsense, I can hit near wire speeds I take pfops finding only as an indication of poor wireguard performance comparing of what could be expected. WireGuard is a free and open source Virtual Private Network (VPN) that aims to replace IPsec and OpenVPN. A client connecting directly just to the OPNSense vpn experiences the same speed. If you can get a faster CPU you should, because this one seems rather slow. By download I mean downloading data from a file server behind the router and by upload I mean uploading data to the file server. Does this have any impact on performance? According to the protocol description, when not using a pre-shared key, wireguard just assumes uses a key of all zeros. kriskra. The servers running WireGuard show good performance when testing against themselves. 04 server, it's acting as a client, when it does iperf3 connection to the WAN IP I get the near line speeds, when it connects to wireguard hosted by opnsense or when it connects to the wireguard service on generic ubuntu 22. The MT7621 GL INET MT1300 result of 83 Mbps is quite slow compared to MT7621 ER-X Wireguard performance of 150-160 Mbps reported here. I also made sure the MTU is set correctly. A Linux Host can upload with up to 120MB/s while Windows can only upload with 10-50MB/s (it varies for the different networks we have). On one side it's RB5009 on another RB4011. More Performance results. Especially if it’s not Wireguard The fact it’s capping at 50mb/10mb leads me to believe hardware. Since then, the original Wireguard performance on FreeBSD has about doubled, but indeed is way below 1 GBit/s. Kind regards I have a wireguard server set up at a residential address. thymon. While the kernel's version has its What latency (average ping time) do you have between your machines? About 40ms VPN performance depends greatly on latency between peers. Performance: OpenVPN: Known for its stability but can be slow due to the overhead associated with SSL/TLS encryption. But their implementation is kind of bad on the Dev builds. Typically, the UDMP/SE is perfectly able to saturate a 1 Gbps connection up and down through wireguard routing as a client. 20210503. Poor Wireguard Performance using Mobile Data. But once I connect my client to the wg VPN, the client computer's Internet throughput drops to just around WireGuard vs. Quote #1; Sat Sep 28, 2024 3:16 am. I have set the interface MSS on the PFsense side down to 1300 but that doesnt To add a little more colour for you, the machine on the other end is just a generic ubuntu 22. Currently, when the router "uploads" something into the WireGuard interface (for the laptop to download), the packets have to go through the list of Hi! I have an issue with my site to site wireguard vpn between OPNSense and Openwrt and that is slow speed, I get around 20mbps while I get at least 300mbps both upload and download at both sites. 8Gbps on a site to site Wireguard VPN via iPerf3. End-user to server WireGuard performance is great too, almost at 100 Mbps. 04 server behind the The performance is consistently poor, and I rack up 50-65 retransmits every second during the iperf test [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0. I have multiple tunnels up and running on my EdgeRouter Infinity and the performance is fantastic, in excess of 700Mbps throughput. iNet GL-E750V2 and tested Internet performance on it with various VPN settings. Meaning The raspberrypi 4, 4GB is a powerful device, but the single threaded nature of wireguard and IRQ adds a lot of overhead that slows down the performance to below 50% of what you can expect with a cheap x86 machine. Things I have tried: - Change ports and forward a different port to see if it was throttled. already researched the performance of WireGuard. Tailscale uses the WireGuard protocol, but not the WireGuard C library (the kernel module). iNet Brume router (GL-MV1000) to use this to provide VPN access via Wireguard to my whole house. It works, but it has very slow download speed, 5 mbps. net (server and client are using ethernet). My IPv4 stack settings are all defaults expect the usual forwarding option. I have a raspberry pi 4 at home serving several apps like plex and emby. Post by tdabasinskas » Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:04 am. The first is over a Tailscale direct connection between my router and a server in the cloud. Reply reply I use WireGuard generally but have Shadowsocks with v2ray and cloak configured for fall backs. speedtest. What this means for you: We have the problem that the connection from multiple client networks via Wireguard Tunnel to a Samba share on a server is slow, but weirdly it only affects Windows 10 and only uploads. Unfortunately that didn’t help either. Hi, I'm a bit clueless right now, because my opnsense wireguard server is not performing as expected. No change. Tailscale continuously seeks ways to improve performance, such as making significant changes to wireguard-go (the userspace WireGuard implementation that Tailscale uses) and taking advantage of the transport Similar-ish issue in that performance is poor. Hello everyone, I have the following setup: Wireguard doesn’t work like other conventional VPNs in the server / client sense. Really slow throughput. kellytrinh opened this issue Aug 9, 2020 · 10 comments Labels. The WireGuard implementation on OPNsense is fairly straightforward without many configurable options. Results were markedly worse using OpenConnect (an open-source VPN protocol), with even a server down the proverbial road only giving me about 10 Mbps. To give you context, wi To recap: server-to-internet WireGuard performance is fine at 1Gbps. Today I have a similar issue but this time with the Wireguard protocol. pfSense had in my tests double the throughput compared to OPNsense. Moderators please move if required. Symptom: I manage to get good performance with above settings (may tweak a bit once this issue is solved): 1 Gbps download / 400 Mbps upload. I should also note that I took every test multiple times and used only the best results; even using WireGuard, I Hello, I'm facing problems starting this wireguard container, I'm running it in a Raspberry Pi 4, usually I've got problems when the container starts to download raspberrypi-kernel-headers, it seems that it restarts to download it every 30s, maybe it's due to slow Raspbian repository, for the system I switched to a local faster repo, but I'm not facing any problem (apart from slightly WireGuard. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Rather, transforming WireGuard's UDP packets into TCP is the job of an upper layer of obfuscation (see previous point), and can be accomplished by projects like udptunnel and udp2raw. only compared OpenVPN with WireGuard and left the IPsec solutions untouched, while IPsec solutions are expected to be better perform-ing [13]. Wireguard was brought into the mainline kernel in v5. 11; I have 2x Flint 2 routers, one per location, and both are on Verizon FiOS 1 Gig symmetric connections. but Upload speeds are a different story, there the Wireguard app is about x1. Closed kellytrinh opened this issue Aug 9, 2020 · 10 comments Closed High performance hit from using Tailscale (Wireguard) #659. The userspace module is an entirely different implementation (written in Go) is slower than the kernel module irrespective of whether it is Wireguard - very slow speeds March 20, 2021, 08:02:39 AM Last Edit : March 20, 2021, 09:03:16 AM by viktri I recently switched over from PFsense to OPNsense. Assignee:-Category: WireGuard. 3 Gbits/sec, so it definitely is not a bottle neck of the VM. I bought it because I read comments saying that they could get >200 mbps performance with a VPN service via Wireguard. The normal speed at this residence is 50 mbps (Comcast 50 mbps plan). Also you acknowledge that you I use wireguard on the UDM Pro unofficially to route as a client, and here's some extensive performance testing I did. Reply to this topic; Start new topic; Prev; 1; 2; 3; Next; Page 3 of 3 . The second is a test between the same two devices but over a plain wireguard connection. Top 4% Rank by size . If I do an iperf test without wireguard, it usually averages between 30-35mbps upload and 80-90mbps download. Reply reply Wireguard definitely works very well with hundreds of servers. 7. Although, when I try and stream certain videos (iptv) I get really bad buffering. I have a VServer (with dedicated 4 AMD EPYC 7702 cores / 16 GB RAM and 2. This may be of the time where it was implemented in Go, however, I have an Intel Atom Silver N6005 and now with the kernel I'm trying to troubleshoot some poor performance using WireGuard. Witeguard works great as I said, but I don't use it for netflix and the like so I In this paper we analyze the performances of open source firmware OpenWrt 21. 6. I heard that Wireguard is faster, but without a VPN my download speed is 450 Mbps, while with the VPN it's only around 60 Mbps. I just ran a benchmark on two of our servers with 10 Gb ethernet cards comparing an unencrypted link vs WireGuard vs OpenVPN using the config files at the end of this post. N adv. Since then I have given up on trying to improve the performance of WireGuard on OPNsense and Hi all! New here. We are custom forwarding requests using the requests Python library. Do not exceed 1420 at the moment. If you’re looking for a modern performant VPN with few configuration hassles then invest your time on WireGuard. Example poor iperf3 run: With a high performance stack, IPsec (and Wireguard for that matter) workloads are limited by crypto performance, not packet processing performance, and the perf difference between IPsec with AES-256-GCM and Wireguard is basically the perf difference of AES-256-GCM vs Chacha20-Poly1305 of your platform. 1vCPU 2GB RAM and 10GB general ssd. From several discussions about wireguard speed in the past, I got the impression that the implementation suffers. There is nothing else running on my CHR, so the CPU / network should idle and as it is running with a t3. Firstly, Mackey et al. Internet -> MikroTik Router on AWS:12345 -> WireGuard Bad performance in rasbpi 4 Hi,I have 2 raspberry pi 4 that are connected by wireguard,and seen a lot of people with simmilar configurations do 500-600mbps when I'm doing like 88mbps my setup is 2 raspberry pi 4 2gb model,in 2 different locations but in the same city,in the same ISP network,both with fan and heatsinks in main chips and running Your performance seems correct for the upload speeds you have specified. iNet GL-E750V2 . I would expect Wireguard to offer much better than ~400Mbps on a gigabit network, but not from a Pi. 5Gig NIC. Post Reply Print view . Hi, We're about to setup a 802. net reports speeds up to 300 Mbps on a fast remote connection or 100 Mbps on a remote wifi connection. WireGuard explicitly does not support tunneling over TCP, due to the classically terrible network performance of tunneling TCP-over-TCP. I personally think it's worth having for 'connecting my phone to my VPS' cases but obviously WireGuard is better if you're needing point-to-point or meshing servers/networks. 10 is shipped with 5. I had done the ERLite-3 test before it and OpenWRT and WireGuard really pulled ahead, even with the ERLite-3's hardware acceleration. Hello, maybe someone can help me with my problem. A. Then, you can temporarily disable all the mangle rules to see if the issue is caused by all the parket marking rules and the queues? WireGuard uses UDP and will be affected by the UDP parket and connection markings. is connected to two VPNs, a cisco VPN(vpnc) and wireguard. just joined. The issue only exhibits itself when a LAN client communicates over the WireGuard interface. WireGuard has its own set of encapsulation, which typically reduces the achievable bandwidth further. I've managed to get it working after some difficulty actually getting access to the . WireGuard sets the interface MTU to 1420. Both got 1Gbit symmetric and ISPs from both locations are linked in local-IX so ping is 3ms between those locations. Anecdotally I have had some marginal improvements in how long I can maintain a transfer at speed through the tunnel by adjusting the MTU for the tunnel down to 1420. Hardware Crypto MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. I have a wireguard connection between to gigabit locations (UDM Pro and UDM Base), and i get roughly 790 mbit/s over wireguard, at which point it maxes out the CPU on both devices. - Check local and home internet speeds without wireguard Symptom: I can route WAN (internet) traffic through my pfSense firewall via full-tunnel Wireguard connection from remote peers at nearly full speed of my remote internet I’ve set up a WireGuard site-to-site connection between my house and my relatives. Since Proton also supports OpenVPN and Wireguard client apps, I Been having poor speed and high ping recently and thought it was something more sinister, but did some testing today and turns out it's down to the Wireguard server being enabled on my AX6000. Preface I'm posting this in the Networking forum, though it could possibly be more valid in the Firewall forum. When you see a performance degradation, fine tune between the last and the current value. WireGuard performance. Quote #1; Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:04 am. CPU temperature / throttling). Is there anything I can do to make the connection Amm0 wrote: ↑ Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:18 am If you're using CHR, IPSec or WireGuard might be better choices than SSTP. I don't know how efficient is wg on windows, but I am running wireguard server on linux on quite old hardware - in the same network via wireguard (so I am not limited by upload) I get only about 150mbps (vs >300mbps directly). I have a handful of VPS servers that I use as WireGuard servers. 1. Overall I heard, that with Linux you will get the best Wireguard performance, but I didn't test this. My question is, are there any ways I might have missed to improve the performance of WireGuard on pfSense? After a week of searching these forums, blogs, and YouTube videos, I am at a loss. Unfortunately, I seem to be getting much worse speeds coming from my Brume router via Wireguard then when I use an app, either on my PC or iOS device. Ethernet performance is great: I am looking at 800-900 mbit/s both up and down on my 1 gbit/s line. Topic Author. Untested, but if If you disable NAT on Docker, you may get better performance. Similar-ish issue in that performance is poor. 20191219 Local 1Gbps LAN MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. Hey, I am out of ideas what could be the issue. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search Mastering Wireguard configuration is key to maximizing network efficiency on Mikrotik devices. Target version:-Start date: Due date: % Done: 0%. Cheers, Franco MartB; Newbie; Posts 48; Raw internal network performance: 493Mbit/s Tailscale performance: 464Mbit/s. Running iperf3 over the local 1Gb network without wireguard gets me ~950Mbps, which is what I'd expect. Poor WireGuard performance on RB5009. Status: New. On the scrappy low power Intel SBC I only get The answer actually depends on the kernel version. Although to be honest i have seen at least a 10% reduction in speeds but what you are describing seems more of a local issue to pfsense. poor performance with SQM on the WAN interface . If you see a performance improvement, keep going up. After asking this question I've gotten a wireguard vpn set-up that forwards all traffic from my local lan to a remote server. @Bob-Dig Yes, only 1 wg-client, and 2 openvpn-clients. 10 (ASRock J4105), plugged directly into the router). I'm running OPNSense 20. With OpenVPN (TCP) I get around 280 Mbps down. But compared to a raspberry, the performance is terrible. Ian Note that these results came from using the high-performance WireGuard protocol. The connection has been established successfully; however, the bandwidth performance is quite poor. tdabasinskas. Edit: A not great but better test ← Home Archive Tags About Subscribe WireGuard vs. iPerf from my Debian VM to the Destination is 20. RouterOS general discussion. OpenVPN: VPN performance on Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite and X. Tailscale is built on wireguard but has a few notable WireGuard bad performance. Poor OpenVPN Performance. This time totally stalled at how to get my Wireguard VPN performance close to my 1Gb internet connection speed. Need Help Hi I have a Wireguard server setup on docker (wg-easy) on a VPS (Oracle free tier VM). It’s installed along a ZTE ONT. 00 sec 956 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 3445 sender Slow wireguard performance . Terrible performance for port forwarding via WireGuard on Cloud Hosted MikroTik router [SOLVED] Post Reply Print view . Then you should use a network performance testing tool such as iPerf, not a disk speed tool. I ran some speedtests, ran some iperf and found this: Is it on a router? Some devices don’t meet the performance requirements for very high VPN speeds. eworm Forum Guru Posts: 1070 Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:23 am Location: Oberhausen, Germany WireGuard bad performance . If an additional layer of symmetric-key crypto is required (for, say, post-quantum resistance), WireGuard also supports an optional pre-shared key that is mixed into the public key As their tagline says, WireGuard is a fast, modern and secure VPN tunnel (communication protocol). Some time ago, before wireguard, I tried the openvpn included in the router but it was like I was back in the early 2000s when 100 Mbs was all there was. This reduces the throughput by a factor of roughly 1420/1500 ~ 94% (ignoring fragmentation overhead) WireGuard -- 900 Mbps throughput limit Overview While there's been a lot of individuals testing various routers, the question still always seems to come up, "What can I expect from Router X?" I won't say that my testing is going to definitively answer those questions, but at least it should be a self-consistent data set. However, end-user to internet performance via two WireGuard tunnels, as shown on scheme above, drops to 20-27 Mbps. Wil Knoll · 2018 Dec 26, 01:40 · 802 words · 4 minutes read WireGuard EdgeOS OpenWRT EdgeRouter Lite EdgeRouter X TL;DR. I read some earlier threads and tried the below already: • Enabled packet steering in Global network options • Enabled software/hardware offloading • Modified br When I use wireguard on my ipad, connected via wifi to my iphone running hotspot I get really incredibly slow page loads, and about 6 mbps download Good suggestion, didn’t help unfortunately. What's more is that computers on the B-Server LAN show good upload performance when running iperf3 against the WAN public IP of A-Server. The fact that both OpenVPN and WG, entirely different protocols, suffer poor performance points to a device issue. The confusing part is the WAN interface has the same settings as the LAN (MTU 1500 Search. 0. I hooked my Brume up to my network and connected it to my VPN service via Wireguard and I am only getting ~30 mpbs down. Everything works great if I keep the server's IPv6 address in the client's config file, but I get abysmal performance (many websites wouldn't even load, others would load but bandwidth would be excruciatingly low) if I don't. Wireguard on the other hand once had a fast X64 implementation for its cryptography like in Linux, but that has been dialed back by a FreeBSD maintainer for "reasons", AFAIR. Recommended Posts. I think WG defaults to either 1420 or 1460 (something under the most common 1500 MTU size so that its packets hopefully fit to prevent fragmentation). 5G Intel i225LM PCI-e NIC and a 3Gbps/3Gbps PPPoE connection running PFSense. WAN interface is a bridge, on a 10G Mellanox ConnectX-3. IPSec vs. Surprisingly, it is slightly faster Guys got a Site-to-Site WireGuard tunnel but I'm not really happy with its performance. October 2023 edited October 2023 in Help. Hello everyone, I have the following setup: RB5009UPr+S+ running v7. 1 virtualized on Proxmox on a server with a Ryzen 7 3700X and a Gigabit uplink. When running iperf server on one router and iperf client on the other, it usually peaks around 500Mbps, That being said, i have found wireguard on pfsense to not be very performant in general. Followers 5. MTU/MSS set on both WAN and Wireguard interfaces (1500/1500 and 1320/1320 respectively, but the values don't seem to be the issue here). x, also virtualized, and Wireguard (VPN) is dropping connection speed by almost 80%. Anyone have any pointers on what I can try to get a little bit more performance? I don't really expect much. 5gbit of my I have not seen any correlation between CPU usage spikes and my wireguard performance woes. I have a really powerful machine running ubuntu that I have set up as my Wireguard VPN server. Posted March 7, 2023. Updated about 1 year ago. (125-140Mbps OVPN server, 35-45Mbps Wireguard server) In fairness I'm not sure if this is the Wireguard implementation on pfSense or setting/config on the Wireguard servers. L5 All users Likelihood P2 Aggravating Priority level T3 Performance/Debugging Issue type. My download speed from my laptop when connected on wireguard is 1mbps down and 19 mbps upload. x compared with a server-side operating system (Debian 11 x64) and Mikrotik 7. The difference could come from the kernel version, but I'm not sure. The problem is the performance between the two sites via WireGuard is terrible. However, there is room for improvement. Estimated time: Plus Target Version: Now, about performance. T. In other words: when doing transfers between client and server, I'm talking Symmetrical connections enjoyed by both PEERS under WireGuard will under excellent circumstance provide 90% or better performance of the subscribed bandwidth assuming peers are capable. The speed You could try lowering Wireguard's MTU length and see if it helps. If you see poor performance regardless of the MTU size, consider to switch to OpenVPN in TCP mode, in case UDP is capped in your network. To be very clear, this is a benchmark. At the moment, they are on the same LAN. Speed stays low for some seconds I recently purchased a GL. I've got a 7100-1U router at two sites, both with 1000/1000 internet, and a wireguard tunnel between the two sites. If I do the same via the CHR, the performance drops to 1 Mbits/s. My WireGuard client is an Odroid C2 running Ubuntu 18. Post by kriskra » Sat Sep 28, 2024 1:16 am. However, the connection from clients on the lan is much slower and drops a lot of connections. What I mean is that when a new node joins, assuming all nodes are Terrible performance over IPv4 Need Help I installed a Pi4 at my parents' house to be my Wireguard server (using pivpn). 0 CE installation. If I understand correctly we test wireguard on localhost. However, via the Wireguard tunnel I'm getting just 350Mbps which seems on the low Windows remote desktop is unusable and load times are about 8 times slower. It is based on a new cryptographic protocol derived from the Noise Protocol Framework. # AWS EKS root@ip-10-25-28-206: Re: Pi4 OpenVPN/WireGuard server performance is terrible Sun Feb 16, 2020 11:46 am I’m less certain regarding Wireguard but in the case of openvpn I’m pretty sure the 25% load you see is actually 1 core out of 4 If you are exposing SMB, then Wireguard doesn't matter, and hopefully you are using SMB3 with encryption enabled, but a lot of providers block the SMB ports anyway, so it seems unlikely to me you are actually directly exposing SMB anyway, still, if you are, yeah, bad idea generally speaking, stop now and get Wireguard working properly instead Low wireguard vpn performance . 5 now have a kernel-resident implementation of the WireGuard® protocol. Improve Performance on S20 FE 4G Exynos. 20210424,1. Since I now have a Pi 4 (4GB), I can provide those results: Test Details. I’ve recently purchased a brand new HAP ax3. eworm Forum Guru Posts: 1070 Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:23 am Location: Oberhausen, Germany Hello! I've recently acquired this mini-pc/firewall and I'm having poor VPN performance on both OpenVPN and WireGuard but only when downloading files; uploads are just fine. I frequently have to uninstall and reinstall the Wireguard adapter to get it to connect. Asymmetrical connections under WireGuard are always subject to the weakest upload Peer and even there WG will exploit 90% or better of the weakest link. txz (older kmod version indeed) I'm bottlenecking my home bandwidth (500/500Mbit) with Wireguard in virtual OPNSense to Wireguard running on TrueNAS (FreeBSD) at my offsite backup (1Gbit). And I have already done that. gu poor performance upvote In my journey to optimize WireGuard's performance on my server, the WireGuard-go implementation by Tailscale emerged as the clear winner, outperforming the kernel version by a significant margin. Same thing, uninstall wireguard and problem gone. As the result the CPU is loaded by encryption and decryption both. I can't find why i have so poor performance on down speeds while the upload is fine. But if you were looking for performance, especially for games, you could skip the EC2+CHR, and setup either AWS Site-to-Site VPN or AWS Poor WireGuard performance on RB5009. Hello, I recently purchased a Brume (standard, no wireless) to use as a VPN router. WireGuard utilizes the ChaCha20Poly1305 cipher suite. Priority: Normal. No lockups or multicolored screens of death. There are lots of reports of poor performance due to MTU issues. Most general use network switches cap around 100 mb/s (Gigabit). I have a 200 Mbit/s up/down fiber optics connection and WireGuard manages to reach 97Mbit/s up/down on speedtest. Our most recent test was I have attached the XDP eBPF program to the wireguard TUN device, and am experiencing poor throughput (speedtest of down ~20 Mbps wireguard + eBPF, vs wireguard - eBPF ~100 Mbps). Added by Pascal Terrien about 1 year ago. " What can I do to improve performance/reduce resource utilisation? Because it is not at the kernel level like traditional wireguard, it will have limitations in speed (the 300 you are seeing). I have another computer as a client (peer). Multiple restarts of WireGuard and the pfSense device. Bad NordVPN performance on GL. Maximize Network Efficiency with Wireguard on Mikrotik! MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. This protocol offers a thorough setup to unlock superior network performance. Still, it's a trivial install and no impact on a server when idle so always worth In the first part of the review of the GL. I did see talk about MTU/MSS tweaks when I searched for into about poor wireguard performance, and I’d also tried tweaking the MTU settings for the Wireguard tunnel itself. UDP and TCP are not even specifically VPN protocols. Currently caps out around 450 to 550Mbps. micro instance, there should be plenty of resources available on For some reason WireGuard on OPNSense is very slow for me. · an undulating space . We have good news. So looking at your results there must be something else causing the bad performance and not the Wireguard BSD implementation. I have updated OPNsense yesterday, so the latest Wireguard package should be installed. The servers that are geographically located fairly close to me have no issue with We made significant improvements to the throughput of wireguard-go, which is the userspace WireGuard® implementation that Tailscale uses. Posts: 4 Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2023 12:34 pm. 1 hosts, which manifests as generally poor performance for all real traffic Network performance with Wireguard extremely poor #28413; AWS vs Azure. It provides better performance and lower power consumption than other existing VPN protocols, such as IPSec and WIreguard slow performance on WIndows11 (ProtonVPN) I am using Wireguard with ProtonVPN on Windows 11. I've set them all to use the BBR2 congestion control algorithm. 00-60. My question is, why so slow speed? Do I need to do modifications to wireguard's default settings? is proxmox's vm limiting the output somehow? is using iptables poor way to forward traffic between lan and wireguard? Any ideas to improve speed would be very much welcome. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; Quick links. I thought it was mtu issue but tried several values without any change, down speed is very low compared to the up speed. See also: OpenVPN performance. But for a 35$ I had a hard time finding results for Wireguard throughput on the Raspberry Pi 4 and how it behaves under sustained Wireguard load (ie. Ask Question Asked 4 years ago. I’m Jose from Spain. All I’m trying to do is establish a site to site VPN connection with WireGuard between them. I'm setting up a tunnel with a friend on his EdgeRouter-X and I expected worse performance from EdgeRouter to EdgeRouter I am getting about 150Mbps. 12_5 I’m able to push 1. More specifically, the Tailscale team applied optimizations such as Wireguard slow speeds and poor 4K streaming . Yes, I know, Iiperf would most likely report higher MTU on wireguard interface at rb5009 is 1420. Go to solution Solved by weirdcrap, November 25, 2022. Table of Hardware: VPN performance. 11s mesh network routed by B. Both computers get >900Mbps to the Internet on their own. That's the the reason why the result is worse than in download test only. 04 also on a Gigabit connection. 5Gbit network) and an always free tier server at oracle cloud (6 cores / 24 gb). The locations are 5 miles apart in the same state. I have a MikroTik Router hosted on AWS (via the "Cloud Hosted Router" subscription offered by MikroTik). 1 We are seeing very poor performance while using MITMProxy in Python. specs on A and B pretty much similar. Questions/Support I bought mobile router GL. If I switch over to kernel, I can’t get more than 270Mbps average. WG ran fine on the Pi4 pair, but there seems to be a problem with WG on the Pi5, as the performance is horrible, as in throwing-it-out-the-window slow. It's been back ported to some earlier versions as well by some distros. WireGuard Performance Tuning? 4pple5auc3 Member. The connection has been established successfully; however, the When using Wireguard-go on OPNsense 23. In an iperf3 test between these servers without VPN (only with open ports) I was able to use the 2. Depending on the CPU throughput you get very bad results. Both max out my phone's connection. One interesting point is that when comparing our EKS clusters using the ENI integration, we can see the MTU set to 9000 while the default AKS is set to 1500. txz (your version indication but possibly not what you seek) wireguard-kmod-0. zwme gzpd mwhrg lxu hars pbvj xdyenl ahmxrm aobmzd ochdepb