Decision in process after revision. Another editor has Saved for Later a partial decision.

Decision in process after revision My paper is now decision in process for over two weeksa after second revision ( 2 reviewers accept, 1 reviewer major revision). The journal is an Elsevier publication that shows a time to acceptance of about 22 days after the first decision, by my calculations (time to final decision - time to first decision). Jul 30, 2021 · Hi! I've got a submission that underwent major and then minor revision and was resubmitted. (I wasn't explicitly asked to send my paper for language editing. 2 Decision making in cognitive psychology Decision making, a notion closely related to problem solving, is also an essential concept in this study. e. Since today I am able to see the "Decision in Process" update. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. authors. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and 2 days ago · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the revision report after the first review round (only the manuscript with peer-reviewed process). My question: what is the fastest time that anyone has experienced for acceptance after a revision? Thank you After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is required within 1 month. However, if your paper was "With editor" and then "Decision in process" without "Under review," it might be a situation that, the AE does not think your paper is not enough qualified to be reviewed. If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. The current status indicates that the paper has gone through a second round of peer review and is awaiting the editor's final evaluation and decision. This is usually journal-dependent, e. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Oct 26, 2023 · Evaluating the Risks and Benefits of Gastric Bypass Revision. The "decision in process" status for a manuscript means that the editorial board is reviewing the manuscript after it has passed peer review. Now, more than one month has passed, but the status is still With Editor’ with a change in the date. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. It has been 3 weeks that the paper status stuck at decision in process. Once the revision is submitted it becomes visible to confirmed co-authors and will remain in ‘Revisions eing Processed’ until a decision is made. The EiC makes the final decision on the manuscript. Oct 11, 2021 · Hi, I got a Major Revision from one of the Journals and I accordingly did all the necessary modifications and submitted it back. Dec 11, 2015 · Thus, it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. some journals can move the status when one review has been submitted, while others might ask for 2 or 3 or more. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. 2020 "Decision in Process" and again on 27. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. October 25: The status changed to Under Review. Five days after submission, it showed that it was with the editor. Feb 5, 2022 · The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". Heliyon. In other words when the handling editor of paper takes the decision and submit it in the system then the status gets changed to decision in process. From the editorial manager account, we can see that the status of our revised manuscript is "Under Review" and it remains unchanged from Jan 02, 2021. Since then it has been 2 months, but yet to receive the decision. Then after 15 days, we received the first round of reviewer reports. Should I wait for them or write to them? Please suggest. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal on September after few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the it changed to all required reviews are completed and immediately to decision in process. Actually, it's a long After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. October 25: The Mar 13, 2022 · I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again For the final revision, authors should use the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter to upload a final version of the text with all the requested format Mar 4, 2015 · Just got the first decision a few days ago. In any case, I wish you have a good result. I thought some revision would be required, but the status was directly changed to “Decision in Process”. This may mean a rejection or it may mean a requirement to revise and resubmit. Decision in Process: The decision process may require some time since the editor needs to read the revised manuscript and the revisions/rebuttal from the author to make a decision. On 24. Whatever it is, you will be informed of the decision soon. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. " On the other hand, if the paper is likely to be desk-rejected, the status changes to "Decision in process. If you Mar 27, 2019 · If the paper clears the initial editorial screening, the status changes to "Assigning reviewers" or "Reviewers invited. It was updated to ‘Under Review’ on December 10, 2020, and has remained so till date. There can be four possible outcomes: Accept; Reject Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. end-revision processes. While 45 days is not especially long for this stage, the process usually moves faster after the second revision. Again, I made the required edits in order to make For the final revision, authors should use the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter to upload a final version of the text with all the requested format Jan 25, 2017 · I submitted a paper to Elsevier on Oct. Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted the second revision of a study to an Elsevier journal on November 11. After peer review, the editor makes a decision based on the reviewer(s) recommendation(s) and their own assessment, which can be any of the following: A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer review round required, editor makes decision) C-revise & re-review Dec 5, 2019 · When the status changed to “Decision in Process”, it meant that based on the peer review, the handling editor had made a decision on the manuscript. 5 months. 5 days ago · The average number of external revision rounds during the entire peer-reviewed process (include both accepted and rejected manuscript). The first decision is made around 3 months after submission. Jan 18, 2020 · Once the AE has completed their review, they will make their decision on the manuscript and communicate it to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), changing the status to Decision in Process/Progress. Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish your paper or not based on their own review or a peer review. The status changed to 'Under review' for around 2. This change has occurred Dec 19, 2019 · Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. Please note you may. Fingers crossed. The status changed to Aug 31, 2019 · ‘Decision in Process’ on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). A minor revision is generally requested as a final step before acceptance. The journal decision-making process is indeed a long and complex one and the authors are not always clear about each step in the process. Analysis and discussion 3. I am grateful to you for your assistance as a reviewer for Heliyon. The status (as usual) changed directly to "With editor" on the system and after 3 days, I received a notification Feb 28, 2022 · In Elsevier, particularly, before this happens, the status of the article shows Decision in Process. The status became “Under Editor Evaluation” on Jan. Another editor has Saved for Later a partial decision. 2 in the beginning of May 2020. the review of capital projects as part of the CD review and approval process. Jan 5, 2021 · After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. So, as mentioned previously, you may have reason to hope. This article provides 10 easy-to-follow steps that will guide you through the revision and then the resubmission of your paper. For rejected papers no further action is required. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. After all revisions have been made (papers may be returned to the author more than once for revision), if the paper is found suitable for publication in a GSA journal, GSA staff will reach out for needed materials, the science editor’s final decision letter to the author will follow, accepting the manuscript for publication. Usually the decision letter came quickly - in 3 days. Apr 18, 2021 · Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. Then this decision is emailed to the author by the editor in chief. At this stage when the journal decision is in process, the editor will go through the revised manuscript and your replies to the reviewer comments before coming to a decision. Final submission and acceptance The peer review process acts as a filter to ensure only good research is published, and improves the quality of research submitted for publication by giving reviewers the opportunity to suggest improvements. After revision, we submitted our revised manuscript (R1) on Dec 14, 2020. Aug 10, 2021 · I sent a manuscript to a high reputation Elsevier journal. In some cases, the AE may again send the manuscript for peer review. After that it is showing decision started since last 30 days? what can be the reasons for such Feb 27, 2018 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal on October 1,2017. Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. The key is to remain calm and address the reviewers' suggestions for revision in a systematic manner. What does this mean? Why is it taking For the final revision, authors should use the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter to upload a final version of the text with all the requested format Sep 14, 2021 · Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. ^ I hope that's true. Also, the second round took 8 months. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. The editor once again provides feedback to authors and renders a publication decision. I think you can expect the decision to be completed within the next few days. Oct 10, 2019 · If you receive major or minor revisions, you will have to make the suggested changes and resubmit the manuscript. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. A manuscript’s progression from submission to decision An invited revision should be submitted via the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter, not as a new manuscript. September 15: I received a major revision decision. Unfortunately, my manuscript was moved from "with editor" directly to "decision in process". The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. Now, after 35 days, the status has changed from With Editor to Decision Under Process. My MS apparently did not undergo p This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission Jun 13, 2018 · The status of my revised manuscript has changed from 'Awaiting ME Processing' to 'Under Review' and now to 'Revision'. From my point of view, one month is enough for the first decision, 2-3 months are OK for the review process, then one month for the final decision after revision. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. July 1: I made the initial submission. May 19, 2016 · I submitted my paper to Springer journal more than a month ago. Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. It remained the same till 11th August after which the status changed to "Decision in process". Your paper seems to be progressing through the editorial process quite smoothly. What does this mean? Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. However, I have heard nothing from the journal for 3 weeks, though I assumed I would receive a response in a few days. After submitting major revision, my paper went for review, after that status again changed received a Minor Revision or a Major Revision decision and will undergo further consideration after reviewer- and editor-requested changes have been made by the authors, and received a Reject and Resubmit decision, meaning that the work requires major structural work beyond normal revisions so that the resubmission will be essentially a new Jun 16, 2023 · Dear Author, Thank you for your question. Which term best describes when the nurse meets with the staff to discuss the findings and communicates ways to achieve the desired goals? Leadership Followership Management Decision making, Which nursing process includes tasks that can be delegated? Planning Evaluation Oct 6, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal and received comments from two reviewers. Final Disposition has been set to Accept. The "Editor invited" status stayed for two weeks, and then it changed to "Decision in Process" directly. It’s important to weigh these factors against the potential benefits to make an informed Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like While auditing unit documents, a nurse finds some omissions. Jun 10, 2021 · I submitted a research article in a Q1 journal of Elsevier on Oct 20, 2020. Sep 30, 2019 · Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final decision about 54 days, but this is dependent upon many factors and is different for each journal. That editor must fully submit their decision before it can be Rescinded. Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. To learn more about peer review, visit the Elsevier Researcher Academy topic on "Navigating peer review" opens in new tab/window. Step 6 Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like High-involvement purchases involve goods or services that are psychologically important to the buyer. Generally, the decision process is much quicker in case of revision submissions compared to initial submissions but during this pandemic there can be a delay if the reviewers are currently not available to review the manuscript. Final submission and acceptance One of our manuscript was published in a journal after 3 rounds of revision. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Undergoing a surgical Gastric Bypass Revision is a decision that should be made after careful consideration. Reject: This is an outright rejection decision, and in most cases, the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the author makes major revisions. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Apr 6, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript in a journal (Springer) and after 3 days the status of my MS changed to "With the Editor" followed by "Decision in Process" after 5 days. Nov 13, 2018 · I would like to ask whether you had a similar experience. After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Jun 26, 2018 · Thus, a change in status from "With Editor" directly to "Decision in process" generally indicates a desk rejection. After this point the revise decision must stand. Comments to author The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; If after peer review a manuscript is considered potentially appropriate for PLOS Medicine, a major revision is generally requested. Does that mean that the manuscript will be rejected? Jul 4, 2021 · There are several factors that influence the time taken to come to a decision post submission of a revised manuscript. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. It is possible that this journal sends out invitations to the editor as soon as a manuscript is submitted, and an admin person conducts the manuscript screening while waiting for the editor to accept the invitation. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. None of these decisions require re-review. This could be a way of speeding up the process, and is probably the reason for the status change to “decision in process. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. . In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Again, I made the required edits in order to make . The review results are very simple and positive actually, simply asking to cite more references and add some discussions. it was under review for a month. I am anxious if there is any problem Maybe because "Decision in progess" is described on Elsevier's support website as: "The final Handling Editor in a journal with split decision and author notification tasks has submitted a decision but the Administrative Editor has not yet notified the author". Associate Editor - Social Sciences. Please share your experiences with the community. My understanding is that the editor has made the decision based on the reviews, but they have now passed the decision to the editor-in-chief. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Revision Dec 11, 2015 · Thus, it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. " Thus a direct change from "Editor Assigned to "Decision in process" usually indicates a desk rejection. Kind regards, Tomayess Issa. If the revision was minor, you may hear back within hours to some days (commonly up to one week). May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. May 8, 2020 · The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make Mar 26, 2020 · Coming to your query, Decision in Process typically means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the peer review comments, arrived at a decision on the manuscript based on the comments, and then conveyed their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Both reviewers asked me to lengthen the introduction part and rewrite a convincing conclusion according to my research. I got review reports after one month of submission. Feraru published ASEAN Decision-Making Process: Before and after the ASEAN Charter | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Aug 14, 2022 · Hi everyone, I had submitted my manuscript on 17th July and on the same day the status "With Editor" appeared. ?!!!!! I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. 18, 2017, and then “Decision in Process” on Jan. A desk rejection usually occurs if the manuscript does not match the scope of the journal, if it fails to meet the journal's guideline or quality standards. Thanks. More than that you may email him Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. be asked to review the revision of this paper in the future. 5 revision rounds during the entire peer-review process. i. And it seems to be one of the last steps of the process. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. As the corresponding author, if you are offered the option to transfer your submission to another journal, a new menu appears for ‘Pending Submission Transfer Offers’. Again, I made the required edits in order to make Jan 1, 2016 · PDF | On Jan 1, 2016, Atena S. The outcome will be Accept, Accept with Minor Revisions, or Reject. Overall, things sound positive, and you should receive the decision soon. Nov 6, 2020 · I recently resubmitted a manuscript after making major revisions. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. Aug 31, 2019 · I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Since 17 Jully, the statut has be changed to decision pending and out for review in the same day too. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. I sent the revised version, and the editor said he would let us know the decision after referee's recommendation. The SRP is a working document developed in a series of individual Review Modules, which address key functional areas of Project Management, Engineering and Design, Jul 23, 2021 · This indicates the completion of the review process of your manuscript and AE will take the decision whether to reject, revise or accept (rare if it is first round). On Dec. I fulfilled the revisions and sent the manuscript on 10. Feb 17, 2016 · Your paper is moving along the submission system as required, albeit slowly. A ‘Decision in Process’ soon after submission typically indicates that the manuscript is being desk-rejected. Why was there no "with editor" status and why did it change to "Decision in Process"? Cross-check all your revised submission components before approving the revised submission pdf file. A second major revision was decided. 08. After 1. Why is now taking such a long time? Jun 22, 2017 · Dear all, yesterday, I submitted my revised paper that had received a "major revision. Jun 10, 2020 · Answer: Hi Abhishek – welcome to the forum! Straight off, I understand your concern. The reviews and the AE opinion is in the database, so it will be invoked in the letter to the authors. 21, 2016. Good luck. Then I revised and sent it back. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Having said that, we have been seeing this trend this year, perhaps due to the situation prompted by Dec 13, 2017 · When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Sep 24, 2019 · On the other hand, if the status changes to “Decision in process,” it implies that the Editor is making the decision on your paper. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. " Today the status was changed to "Decision in progress. 6. After a while, I received a message stating that the revisions I made have been accepted by the reviewers and I was only being asked to proofread the manuscript again to correct potential mistakes. Normally “editor invited” comes after manuscript screening. After getting a minor revision, a revised version of manuscript was submitted three months Jan 1, 2023 · Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. I submitted manuscript in Springer Journal with IF 1. Dec 8, 2019 · I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. Jan 13, 2021 · I received a decision of ‘accept after minor revision’ for my submission to a Springer Nature journal. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. What exactly does 'Revision' mean? Does it mean the same thing as 'Awaiting Decision'?Meanwhile, the trajectory of the first and second review cycles of the paper did not include 'Revision' as a status; the status changed from 'Awaiting ME Processing' to 'Under Review' and An invited revision should be submitted via the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter, not as a new manuscript. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the Jul 29, 2019 · The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. Nov 19, 2020 · After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. Roux-en-Y revision surgery, while beneficial for many, also carries certain risks. I've got a paper that has been in "Decision in Process" for 3 weeks. The various status updates are as follows. Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be made by the academic editor after peer review once a minimum of two review reports have been received. 15,2017, the status changed to 'Decision in Process' and it is stuck at this stage since then. 1 Problem solving in revision The elicited TAP data suggest that, in contrast to what is depicted in Wilss’s (1996: 188) decision-making model and the classic problem-solving and decision-making theories, a complex process is often involved in translators’ end-revision processes. 5 months since the first submission, I got a major revision but it made me happy as all the comments were positive mainly on the restructuring of some words, adding references, etc. Moreover, careful revision for grammar and typos have been suggested. The “decision in process” only lasts a few days to a week. Acceptance decisions are made by an academic editor (the Editor-in-Chief, a Guest Editor/Topic Editor/Collection Editor, or another suitable Editorial Board member). 2020 - "Decision in Process". Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the reviw reports do invite for more opinion different from the initial Mar 3, 2014 · Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. and more. After one month, today, my status changed from Required Review Completed - Decision in Process - With Editor. " In my experience, it should be "Under review", and then "Decision in progress" a few weeks later, right? We think we have completed 90% of required experiments and responded to every question of reviewers. I sent the review reports addressing all the comments raised by reviewers and letter Our editorial process focuses on the robustness and validity of your research, from methodological, analytical, statistical and ethical perspectives, rather than making subjective decisions on Dec 14, 2020 · I had sent a paper to Elsevier. The day I submitted the revised version, the status was ‘With Editor'. After one month, it still showed that it was with the editor, but with a different status date. ) I read the manuscript again and again and corrected a few Sep 6, 2016 · I have submitted a manuscript in (nature) Scientific report journal. As the manuscript has gone for a peer review and then for a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), indicated by the ‘Decision in Process’ status, you are concerned that the decision will be to reject – that’s why it’s not coming to you for a revision, either major or minor. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? decision, but also enables the author(s) to disseminate their work at the highest possible quality. The status was ‘Under review’ for a week. Jun 19, 2020 · Now, ‘Decision in process’ means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and has communicated this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final decision on the manuscript. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. For the final revision, authors should use the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter to upload a final version of the text with all the requested format Step 7: Editor in Chief Decision (7 days) The EiC makes the final decision of major or minor revision, acceptance or rejection of a manuscript upon the information received from the AE. It seems strange. , Products are more difficult to evaluate than services. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? The "decision in process" is the editor choosing if the next step is acceptance, revision, or rejection. Usually when you make it to revision step, it means you are on the right path! Nov 24, 2016 · I have submitted my manuscript in one of the top journal of Elsevier. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching holiday season. I received a major revision of one of my articles. Editor Decision. Oct 20, 2017 · After months of working on your research paper, receiving a "revise and resubmit" decision from the journal can be very disheartening. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. Step 5: Final Decision After one round of revision and resubmission, the primary editor typically makes a final publication decision. The paper will go back to the original reviewers and then they decide if it needs more revision or its good enough. If you do not think you will be able to return a revised manuscript in the allotted time tell the editor immediately. 1. Good luck! Related reading: After three rounds of review and revision, why is the status "with editor" again? 2 days ago · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the revision report after the first review round (only the manuscript with peer-reviewed process). The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Based on the Small Review Speed Feedback System, it takes 0. Dec 12, 2024 · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the revision report after the first review round (only the manuscript with peer-reviewed process). Again, I made the required edits in order to make 2 days ago · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the revision report after the first review round (only the manuscript with peer-reviewed process). g. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. In many cases there is cause for another round of reviews which would loop back to 4 and 5. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. Three decision-making models will be reviewed in turn, as these models are seen to complement each other and help us understand decision making in the translation process. 07. The status consequently changed and was "Decision in process" for 3 days, when right after it changed to "With editor". “Decision in Process” is also a way for the handling editor to communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision on the manuscript. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. , A need can become stronger and be brought to our attention by a deterioration of our actual state or an upward revision of our ideal state. Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 5 days ago · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the revision report after the first review round (only the manuscript with peer-reviewed process). It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. On December 1, it turned to ‘Decision in Process,’ but has been stuck at this stage for nearly six/seven weeks. I made the revision and resubmitted in the last week of November 2020. Jul 18, 2021 · I submitt the revision version on 10 Jully, on the 13th the statut changed to with editor and out for review in the same day. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. The comments were entirely new. If the authors revise and resubmit the manuscript after review, the editor will often review the changes to decide if the reviewer comments have been fully addressed. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. All the best! Related reading: What does "Decision in process" mean? What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Jun 17, 2023 · My research field is pure mathematics. 2020-the required reviews completed; On 10. Oct 11, 2020 · Secondly, from the dates you have provided, your manuscript has been in Decision in Process for just over a month, not two. I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Aug 4, 2021 · The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). TIP: journals have different revision deadlines which vary from as little as a few weeks to three months depending on the revisions that need to be made. After you complete the submission, brief your coauthors and wait for the decision. In Elsevier, particularly, before this happens, the status of the article shows Decision in Process. Read the reviewers comments, make the changes are you see fit. I'm ready for rejection, I've already prepared it for another journal :) Jul 26, 2018 · My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. Granting that presupposition, my first guess is that the editor got the reviewers' reports and was about to make a decision ("decision in process") but then noticed that something was unclear in one of the reports and asked the reviewer for a clearer report ("under review"). However, even one month is a long time for a manuscript to be in the decision stage, that too, after a round of revision. How long this stage normally takes ? My last submission date after minor revision was Jan 17, where a minor revision comments from review was completed on Mar 17. Sep 29, 2014 · 5. 22. Apr 28, 2019 · The question presupposes that the behavior of such an editorial system has a meaning. If you do not, write out a response why not and then resubmit to the editor. I empathize with the frustration you must be experiencing due to the extended waiting period. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. How long does it take to give a decision after revision? Decisions can be undone or Rescinded, only when none of the following is true: Author has begun the revision process. Mar 15, 2016 · The exact semantics of this vary depending on the journal, but as a rough guide, the resubmitted manuscript for a “major revision” decision will be returned to the same reviewers for their opinion on the new version; a minor revision will be scrutinized by the AE; and an accept will move straight into the publication queue. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision Some journals send reviewers the comments of other reviewers on the same manuscript along with the decision letter; reading these comments can help you improve your future reviews. Still can not understand though why so simple and straightforward review comments need 3 months to conceive! Oct 12, 2021 · Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. Nov 9, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. 8. The editors consider reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Nov 20, 2024 · Stage 4: Decision. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for two weeks. I should point out that I am day 10 of my wait. 2021. zxpxn nsvz pykdwzsg dgqz dgumrltx nndpegm tpf hucccw uwgcfirl qrdzb