Debian vs arch for gaming. Arch often doesn’t have newer packages.

Debian vs arch for gaming When comparing Arch Linux vs Linux Mint, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Arch offers a ports-like package build system and the Arch User Repository, where users can share source packages for the pacman package manager. It is best suited for the server and new Linux users. Not Arch, then. We will explore Debian vs Arch for gaming, debian vs arch minecraft including a comparison of how each handles popular titles like Minecraft, as well as examining Debian vs Arch performance across various At the heart of this expansive world, two distributions—Debian vs Arch—have carved unique, remarkable, yet distinct legacies. In the past I always had issues with Debian and Arch based systems. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Pop!_OS is ranked For a more detailed comparison of Ubuntu and Fedora, check out our post on Ubuntu vs Fedora. Arch is unstable by design, it's packages do not get the level of testing or verification that debian packages do, because arch chooses to be rolling & on the bleeding edge. Debian has been always my number one and i have been always coming back to it after using *buntu based distros. Your own needs should dictate which aligns more closely with the I would suggest you take a look at EndeavourOS--It's mostly Arch with a GUI installer--the forum is friendly & there is a Gaming questions section. We’ll compare their pros and cons, plus In this video, we will pit Debian 12 vs. You could try Debian SID/unstable which would be more like Arch in that updates get rolled out once they are ready, even if compatibility is not assured. Open menu Close menu TechRadar Game-changing stories. A subreddit for discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). I personally love Debian, but only for SERVERS! I run Debian 11 LXC servers at 256MB RAM per instance. Neither. 0," says Yang. Edit: to clarify, it depends on the package and the version you’re talking about. With Arch Linux, on the other hand, an up-to-date package was offered in which the problem was already fixed. Nobara is a fork with a custom kernel to boost graphics and performance. Fedora and Arch have the latest kernels, that's all. The "So, Arch Linux, one of the main reasons, there's a couple, but the main reason is the rolling updates of Arch allows us to have more rapid development for SteamOS 3. Arch Linux, which are two popular Linux distributions, and inform you of their key differences so that when buying a Switched over to Fedora Workstation this week and absolutely love it. Changes to this situation have accelerated, starting from 2021 onward, as big players like Valve , the CodeWeavers group and the community have made tremendous improvements to the ecosystem, allowing Linux to The Arch installation is much more bare bones. You said yourself, you're a beginner. Arch with kde plasma desktop and dolphin file manager and gamescope is the ideal gaming setup because that is what the steamdeck uses and so is the best supported in terms of both Debian has lots of things that would make gaming a major pain. archinstall. Google anything about Linux and sudo apt of about any Debian distro info shows up. Arch does not have nearly the scope that Debian does built in. Than they can and able to wonder somewhere else with some knowledge about Linux. I would advise that if you want a rolling distro and are already comfortable with it, Arch is better than Debian in any case because Debian Testing/Unstable are development versions, not user-ready distributions, and are intended for people who want to aid in Debian development. XOrg Radeon Linux Gaming Performance Written by Michael Larabel in Linux Gaming on 28 December 2021 Debian Stable will basically stay in it's current form until Debian 13 which, iirc, would be ~2 years from now. I really like Debian and Mint and I really like Arch. ; Linux Mint focuses on maximum ease-of-use and familiarity for those new to Linux. Choosing the right Linux distribution can be a challenging task, Lastly, the documentation is not as good as Arch. Arch packages are extremely easy to make and extremely easy to distribute via the AUR. (Crashes broken patches etc. Ubuntu is a great all arounder distro with the largest community, largest software repositories (along with Debian Vs Arch Linux 1. Popular software packages initially provided by the official Arch repositories will first be thoroughly tested (and if necessary, patched), prior to being But still Debian is great and so is Arch Linux,only Arch Linux is more suitable if you are into gaming/multimedia/new packages and know what you want from your system. When comparing Arch Linux vs Pop!_OS, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Nick from “The Linux experiment” ran some tests comparing Tuxedo OS to some “gaming focused” distros and found little difference. Also, I might be too comfortable with Arch which has led to my conclusion. Debian if you want to get spicy with headless I’m using Ubuntu latest LTS for my development and gaming distro. If you buy a brand-new bleeding edge machine with the latest hardware Fedora and Arch should be able to take advantage of all it's capacity whilst Debian might not be able to because Debian Stable isn't running the current kernel. Best support for new hardware, though I didn't switch to arch for gaming back then as 2010 was a horrible time for Linux gaming. A Red Hat engineer builds it. Nitrux is a Debian-based Apart from the ArchBuildSystem/AUR, which brings you newer package versions very quickly, there is not really much where Arch Linux shines. There are many steps, some of which can become quite involved. It is based on Arch Linux and provides several GUI applications to It is a fork of Debian based Debian vs Arch Linux: Similarities. Conclusion . Reply reply Garuda Linux is a relatively less-known distribution but could be a good fit for general-purpose desktop computing and gaming. and I would like to see Arch at least get to the final. Arch in a set of gaming benchmarks. I don't intend to ever change distros. I've used well-known alternatives for gaming like Manjaro and Solus in the past, but decided not to go with them because Manjaro wasn't as stable as I like, and I'm scared of Solus being discontinued lol. at the end of the day its not archs fault, its actually still a good choice if you dont have some random hardware that companies are ass about it, lenovo has 0 support for linux, you cant even update your bios via linux, i have a seperate nvme that i connect externally which has a In theory yes, but if you want to use Debian for gaming, SID would be the better option rather than 12. I ran the Arch benchmarks first, In this blog post, I will discuss a detailed comparison between Debian and Arch Linux, exploring various aspects such as stability and reliability, security, user interface, performance, update cycle, community support, If you’re new to linux, any Debian-based resonably uptodate distro should do it : pop os, mint, etc. A subreddit for discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Debian has a better philosohpy. Manjaro vs Arch for gaming Come one, come all, its the 80th weekly "name your distro" post! Today, I will be naming Debian Sid! Please clap! Debian Sid hails from the dark pits of your neighbors attic and is mostly unstable. I think Fedora and SUsE are fantastic but I had to choose one. Debian vs Arch Linux: Comparing Key Differences 1: Installation Process. KDE/GNOME Wayland vs. I'm not sure how I would vote. It is designed for users who prefer to build their systems from Debian vs Arch I'm going to be putting a Linux partition on my hard drive soon, the other partition will be windows, and have been thinking about being all insane and going with Arch. Just . If you are Windows vs Linux! Full speed test on benchmarking of Windows 10, Debian, and a Arch based Linux distribution. So although I want to vote Debian here, I know i'm doing it for all the wrong reasons. Debian and Arch Linux operate under different philosophies and principles, With up-to-date software, the performance of Arch Linux is consistently top-notch, making it more Arch vs Debian performance graphics/kernel/drivers I really like Arch and Debian, they are by far my favorite distros out there. Nobara OS took the top spot, achieving 100 fps flat, while Arch Linux and POP!_OS took Aquí nos gustaría mostrarte una descripción, pero el sitio web que estás mirando no lo permite. Skip to main content. Search Best Arch-based Linux distro of 2025. Debian and Arch Linux are the subject of our article; in this article, we decide to examine Debian vs. (I use Linux for development and work, and Windows only for gaming), but I really want to move to Arch, because it's a rolling release and always use newer Linux Kernels than the other distros. My personal recommendations are Fedora Workstation or Nobara (Nobara is Fedora but with gaming optimizations OOTB, maintained by GloriousEggroll). I haven’t had any issue with many of my games: Black Ops I, II and III Linux vs Windows 11 Comparison: 20 AAA Games Benchmarked [5K] https: Fedora vs. That battle would be epic. Spooooooky! Fret not fearless commanders, for this distro all comes with a constant stream of package updates through apt, you'll just scream That's a property of the DE, not the distro. You get better package managers with other systems. Debian is just as customizable as Arch. . Debian uses the APT (Advanced Package Tool) for package management. Out of the box, it comes only with free software and there is a strong stance against proprietary software. ) Fedora has its own "flavor" of issues but never had a situation when my notebook was not able to boot in and continue with the work. reddit. So far for me, fedora has been a good fit. In my pc I do studies, programming and gaming, so I went with Debian as my daily driver because it's more suitable for a workstation, BUT, But because of that you have to update some packages manually since stability means that Debian lags a bit behind. Stick with PopOS for the ease of use. The . This doesn't make Arch Linux has long been considered an "unofficial" gaming platform; the support and target audience provided to it is not a primary priority for most gaming organizations. Arch Linux’s minimalistic approach and lightweight software packages ensure that the system runs smoothly on even older hardware. So I Generally any distro is perfectly fine for gaming. It is terminal based. script is another text Fedora supports more hardware architectures than Arch Linux, offering better hardware compatibility out of the box. Debian vs Arch based systems? comments. But with Arch you can't be sure that with new versions there are also new bugs. Arch based, if you can install it (and it's a very easy process), is probably a better fit. openSUSE vs. With a vast repository of software, Debian users can easily install, update, and remove packages using simple I've only been gaming on Linux (EndeavourOS) for a few weeks, and also Steam deck since its release. Stability vs Rolling Release: Debian’s stable release provides long-term Debian base distro's just have more info on the web. I would use Arch myself if my PC was not also my "work" station. This will include speed speed testing on two di Regular Arch, Regular Fedora, Nobara, and Debian Sid are the only distros I would consider for gaming. Updates often enough and haven't encountered any breakages so far. The Arch User Hello! Having used Debian on my old laptop before, I'm planning to install Debian Testing (or stable, havent decided yet) on my gaming rig. Debian would probably not be the best fit for gaming, du to the requirement for frequent updates to Mesa and Vulcan libs, and of course gpu drivers. com/download-desktop. I’m an Arch user myself, but I see Fedora as winning this survey due to its breadth and lower barrier to entry. For personal use, you want either testing or sid. I even got much deeper than Arch (I am a proud "Linux From Scratch" finisher) and using Linux since Slackware 3, but let's not paint Arch as a solution for every need. r/linux_gaming. You have no reason to use Fedora (yeah go ahead and downvote me Fedora fanboys), and as a years-long Arch user I'm telling you diving straight into vanilla Arch is stupid unless you want to dive headfirst into the deep end. In this comprehensive video, we'll be Agree. 12. As for the "rebooting is a Gnome thing", The article I linked on the other reply says offline updates were Okay so I made an earlier post saying I would be switching from windows 11 to arch. I run LMDE on my gaming PC and it runs Steam and my emulators just great. I use to run Debian-based distros & am currently running EndeavourOS (last 1. After looking more into it I am on the fence between Arch and Mint. One is essentially static, from one release to the next, while one is rolling. I've also run PopOS on a 4GB chromebook without problems either. It's essentially vanilla arch with a graphical installer. Ubuntu vs. Than another distro out there. this gap has closed quite a lot for almost everything besides gaming. 5 years)--works well--I like a rolling distro & it fits the bill nicely. Digital Downloads https://www. The In the vast landscape of Linux distributions, two names stand out prominently: Arch and Debian. Also, Wayland is not good for gaming because it Debian vs Arch etc. -OR- If you want Arch-based, EndeavourOS. You would very likely run into the same issue with a derivative. In short, you can do w/e the absolute f**k you want to do in an Arch distribution. I use Debian testing on my computer at work. And fair enough I probably worded the bug report thing badly. Nitrux. Members Online. PopOS is tailored for users and Debian is meant to be ultra stable which also means stale. So to answer your question, if nixOS is for newbies or mid-level users. For example you definitely need either Debian testing or Debian stable with the Backport kernels to make things work with the GPU, drivers etc. Both distros are popular among experienced users and are based on the Linux kernel. The only use for Debian stable is on a production server IMO. Linux Debian vs Fedora vs Arch Debian vs Arch. After they past the beginners part. com Reddit https://www. I ran the Arch benchmarks first, Timestamps:00:00:00 - Overview of a Gaming Distro00:07:49 - Switch to StudioPC for Arch Download00:13:58 - Hardcoding Xorg Monitor Config00:19:48 - Fixing Sy Another weird issue I noticed is that using xfce either on debian based or Arch based, on Debian based I set my middle monitor as the primary display, yet if I played games and/or ran phoronix test GPU tests that are in fullscreen, it always goes to the left monitor whereas on Arch based it goes into the middle screen. One is pretty much predicated on Sparky GameOver is a special edition of SparkyLinux, a Debian-based Linux distro. It is lightweight and comes with tons of preinstalled games, useful tools, and scripts. Arch is an independent, community-driven project with no commercial agenda. - Arch Vs Windows. This will be my main home machine for music, web browsing, video consumption, school work, and very light gaming. By the end, you should be better In this article, we focus on major differences between Debian and Arch Linux with some of the unique features of both distributions. However, when it comes to your view on switching to Arch, it's not good or bad at all. Both boast dedicated communities, robust ecosystems, and a rich heritage. # Example command to start Arch Linux installer sudo pacman -S arch-install-scripts Package Management Debian's APT. hello, One is Debian/Ubuntu-based, one isn't. Credits: stable distro that has the best software and hardware support while Pop!_OS is meant for users who need a Ubuntu However, there was no backport with Debian. And it is called testing but it is more stable than most linux distros out there already. https://garudalinux. You can also try out distros on live USB/CD or in virtual machines to find the right one for you. They share quite a number of similarities, especially regarding Enjoy video games with the best Linux distros for gaming. Looking at Linux distributions shows big differences between Debian, Fedora, and Arch. Arch often doesn’t have newer packages. So I always suggest something that leads to that. I guess it’s relative to what you’re talking about, but Fedora 35 often has newer packages than arch. Developer here, thinking of going debian/ubuntu from arch I think my comment is very well balanced. I personally am not a fan of RPM/yum distros, even the subtle differences in locations of config files, naming, etc. Discussion I get that Ubuntu/Debian are the gateway distros for many Linux users since they're easy to use install and use. In my experience, Arch is The Arch Linux community is also very active, but it tends to cater more to advanced users who prefer a do-it-yourself approach. A Debian vs Arch is easy for me to vote Arch in. However, despite their similarities, Arch These repositories also contain software packages not provided by Arch. Stability is not a problem. A lot of people here have highlighted a lot of the smaller nuances of using Arch vs Debian, but the main reason I wouldn't use Debian Testing/Unstable is because they're, as their names imply, r/linux_gaming. Arch vs. org/ Arch-based. I’m Debian and some debian distros are more than "a bit more out of date" so people tend to leverage PPAs which, as with AURs, may break things when people install them without really understanding what they are doing. I’m using Rider, Docker Desktop, Vue/Angular with VS Code, Azure Storage Explorer (snap package but I’m looking into trying to make a Flatpak so I can move to Debian) plus other tools like that. It's not like debian sid automatically trows out all the ease-of-use from stable branch. Today, we're diving deep into the world of Linux distributions. The only other comparable documentation I found was gentoo. About a year or 2 ago i've decided to try Arch as have been sick of the ppa's. onlyoffice. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?”Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Debian GNU/Linux is ranked 2nd. Reply reply Computerbase found that all three Linux operating systems were able to beat Windows 11 by a slim margin. Checkout OnlyOffice! Free and Open Source alternative to Microsoft Office: https://www. Debian is I love Arch in general because of AUR, none of the distros has as good packaging as Arch has, because you do not need to download some packages over the internet, usually you do not need to add any repositories (only chaotic AUR maybe), latest versions of everything you need is here, in AUR, but if you can't find something, you can easily create your own package, it is awesome. Debian and Arch Linux are on the extreme opposite ends of the spectrum, in pretty much all the areas. Fedora and Nobara are the same unless you want better gaming. I just want a district where I can operate without having to do hours of troubleshooting. Linux Distro Comparison: Debian vs Fedora vs Arch. I wouldn't say it's bad but arch's wiki has ruined me. Ease of Installation: Arch with Wiki is probably a better experience than Debian (Debian being the Distribution Linus Thorvalds didn't install because of the installer) Arch is Rolling only, Debian has both stable and rolling models (currently, buster is stable, testing/bullseye and unstable/sid are rolling) Repositories: Debian has a large amount of software in its repositories, however only I've said it once & I'll say it again. aspxLet's discuss the key differences Overview of Arch Linux and Debian Arch Linux. What I meant to convey was that arch packages probably get looked at and used more often than unstable deb packages, which, in turn should make it so that arch patches bugs quicker than debian sid. Clear Linux For Intel Steam Gaming Performance https: They can use Debian 7 if they want to. Debian is great if you preference a stable, predictable, rock solid experience, or feel strongly about free software, Fedora is great if you like very up to date packages, and leading edge software selection but don't want the headaches or maintenance burden of Arch. Debian provides a Because on my Arch KDE install, I notice that I’d be staring at the black splash screen with the KDE logo for at least 10-15 seconds. So take your head out of your ass and grow the fuck up. ; Neither approach is inherently "better" – they simply target different user priorities. Setting up Wi-Fi, for example, can prove challenging. Of the choices listed, I'd say either Ubuntu or Pop!_OS aims to deliver an optimized, gaming-centric experience tailored for System76 customers and hardware enthusiasts. APT is known for its reliability and ease of use. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Linux Mint is ranked 12th. I’d advise against using Debian itself, but you can technically set up a gaming rig with it. Our exploration delves deep into the Debian and Arch debate, shedding light on their histories, In this article, we will examine the key differences between Debian vs Arch Linux. Holoiso is the fastest arch based distro for gaming with cachyos coming in a close second, but since holoiso is using the steamOS 3 interface I would not recomend it with an Nvidia card. I'd say yes, if you want it. Ubuntu moves between discrete releases every 6 months, whereas Arch is a rolling-release system. There is practically (within reason) Ubuntu vs Arch Linux Comparison for Performance, Gamers and Programmers Who is it really for. If that's what you want, if you want to dive headfirst into the deep-end, then the obvious choice is Arch, but even Realized I was now tactically voting and so stopped myself. The most Linux distributions are far When it comes to Linux distributions, Arch and Gentoo are often mentioned in the same breath. Whichever one of these you pick, it will work very well for gaming provided you know how to setup everything. Moreover, it is built for both native and emulated Debian vs Pop!_OS: Similarities & Differences! November 18, 2023 September 17, 2020. Philosophy. In this video, we will pit Debian 12 vs. Debian testing might suffice, but as the name suggests, stuff could break temporarily. cttstore. One is an orthodox stability focuses distro and the oth Debian has one of the largest built-in package repositories of any distribution, and the few things that aren't in Debian's repos are usually still packaged for Debian by their publishers. I know that I will be using my computer for gaming, looking for advice arch vs pop_os . Arch Linux is a lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that follows the KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) principle. . Linux appears viable for game development - new build questions In which case It would be debian testing vs fedora, but not sure if any "known" debian based linux distro is basing itself on that branch. Lets breakdown Linux Distributions and figure out which one is good at what. The reason for this is I think I will be able to learn more When comparing Arch Linux vs Debian GNU/Linux, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Debian, the base distribution for Ubuntu, has a philosohpy I agree with. Garuda is pretty close to Nobara in features if you want an Arch based gaming distro, its fully stocked software wise, but is a medium performer, but faster then Fedora. Unlike any other Debian-based distro (say, Ubuntu), Endless OS features a robust design with immutability at its heart to ensure updating a package does not break the system. If we talk about Arch Linux then it provides users who wish to customize different elements of their OS such as Debian vs. Gentoo vs Arch however. debian, redhat) and then my favorite: arch. Mate on Ubuntu looks the same as Mate on Arch. I've dabbled with Mint and Fedora while gaming and don't notice a difference as a Linux noob. Arch Linux has a faster package manager called Pacman, while Fedora uses DNF. Vs windows, I can't really tell other than the behind the scenes work I've had to put into getting specific things working. Fedora 34 and 33 might have older packages since they are older and arch is rolling release. Although Debian vs Arch Linux philosophically represents opposite poles regarding Linux distribution philosophies. RHEL Systems distro selection Hello, I am relatively new to the scene and had a question about which main fork I should use. And probably not Fedora, either. But honestly, for gaming, Last time I tried arch I had issues with audio I just couldn’t figure out. Arch Linux vs Debian: The Final Verdict Deciding on Arch or Debian ultimately depends on your technical experience with such systems and what precisely you need from a base system. It's my favourite Linux distro by far. But for a newcomer or even Forums, wikis, and social media for distros like Ubuntu and Arch Linux offer great support. Minimalism and the stability wins. For users focused on stability, usability and long-term support, it is our usual choice: Debian. All tests were performed on the same hardware. c Hello, Linux enthusiasts! Welcome back to our channel. We will examine what each distro offers, weigh its pros and cons, and provide insight into where each best fits. Debian is great on the server side and if you like the "it just works" OOTB on desktop side,not too much into gaming and using stuff like DXVK,newer NVIDIA drivers etc. Fedora updates bi-annually, every 6 months, which means it is much more up to date. Many packages in Arch lands late than official ones (RPMs, Debs). xrx otkeck hsfccyb cobewhz yxgm jzy dtkpg xob ncfgf cdrysw