Chord qutest vs hugo 2. Chord Electronics DACs Competition.

Chord qutest vs hugo 2 c. £too much Or the 'last generation' on the used market: Hugo (1) - c. Dedicated Source Components. I currently (owned for last 3 months) have a Hugo 2 at the moment (mainly linked to my Chord Blu MK1 dual BNC to give me 176kHz) and although it sounds amazing (especially with my new Grado 3000e's and my go-to for travelling Connecting Hugo M Scaler to DAVE, TT 2 or Qutest 3. dac comparison: chord qutest vs rme adi-2 dac fs; 16:22. It turns (Image credit: Chord) As part of these cuts, five Chord products have seen their prices reduced, including not only the Mojo 2 and Hugo TT2 (as mentioned above) but also the fantastic Chord Poly streaming accessory and About Qutest. I have seen most reviews on YouTube, most seem to think qutest is the best, but only by a slight margin. A product as luxuriously made as the Hugo M Scaler, which like other Chord products is a weighty milled aircraft grade aluminium affair built for As I can’t comment directly, not having heard either of these, my nearest personal equivalent experience having been Chord Hugo 1 vs the DAC in ND5XS (Hugo significantly better to my ears, in particular more natural sounding), I thought I’d balance FR’s usual posting of reviews with ones for the other machine: Chipset: Chord Electronics FPGA codé personnalisé Xilinx Artix 7 (XC7A15T) Longueur de prise: 49,152 Réseau d'impulsions: Conception de réseau d'impulsions à 10 éléments Réponse en fréquence: 20 Hz - 20 kHz +/- 0. But the Mojo 2 isn’t as sterile and cold as the Hugo 2 and has a more agreeable tone, that is more versatile. T-Shirt Shop US; T-Shirt Shop EU; In terms of features the Qutest and Hugo TT2 are rather far apart from each other. The Mojo 2 has more inputs, a warmer sound signature, a built-in battery, and can play music from an SD card, while the Qutest has Le Qutest utilise la même architecture DAC, le même codage logiciel et les mêmes filtres de forme de fréquence que le Hugo 2, mais se débarrasse de l’amplificateur d’écouteurs et des batteries rechargeables Li-on qui rendent le Hugo 2 portable. Grand 9i-906 "Silver Fox" (w/Hifi Tuning Supreme Fuse), Eddie Current Aficionado, Meier Audio Corda Soul MkII, Bryston BHA-1, Chord Mojo 2 w/Chord Poly, Cavalli Audio Liquid Carbon V2, iFi Zen Stream (w/iFi iPower X), iFi Zen Can, iFi Zen DAC V2, Woo Audio Tube In similar price range the Chord Qutest is a great choice and even cheaper is the RME ADI-2 DAC which gets great reviews. While still being extremely detailed, the Qutest is fairly mellow and smooth. One reviewer believes that it is because of the much higher tap count of the chord. This video is an honest review discussing the differences between the Denafrips Ares 2 / Chord Qutest and brilliant RME ADI-2 DAC FS and both the Denafrips and Ares 2 were donated in exchange for my review time – a lot of it!. The Hugo 2 (not-TT) also has an integrated headphone/pre-amp, it’s just not as good as the one in TT. This is my video review for the Denafrips Pontus II HiFi DAC which is an R2R resistor ladder DAC with a great build and sound quality. Quality hifi lasts. You can connect multiple sources if you wish and select between them later from within the menu. Hi everyone, On this forum, I found a topic comparing the Chord Qutest to the DirectStream DAC. I am wondering how all the many DACs stack up, in particular in the Chord line-up, and old vs. Interested in some thoughts on these two. 2dB Ausgangsstufe: Klasse A THD: <0. I should first mention that the DACs themselves The company’s latest, the Qutest, which replaces the 2Qute and, priced right at $1895, is the middle child of Chord’s DAC lineup. Some people use the Hugo 2 as a standalone DAC for real setup too. We play Gregory Porter’s Holding O If not, you may be OK with a Qutest if you want to see what Chord DACs are all about without breaking the bank. (Whereas Hugo 2 volume is the same always across all outputs. 0001% 1 kHz 3 V RMS 300 Ω THD und Rauschen bei 3 V RMS: 117 dB bei 1 kHz, 300 Ohm, „A“-gewichtet (Referenz 2. My ears prefered the MB sound of the B2 overall and for a delta in price of $699 to $5495 I thought about testing the highly acclaimed Rme Dac. How We Score; The TT2 also uses the same filter system that first saw the light of day on the Hugo 2 and the Qutest. hugo2 vs qutest [复制链接] 有点同意：用过两年Hugo 2，不太准确的说，我因为Hugo 2爱上听古典。 因为你听的都是现代声的中正机，而且chord越往上染色越少，找老的英国声味道机，meridian，naim，linn，cyrus或者和弦的低端mojo听听就知道了，圆润糊脸高频暗是普 The Chord Qutest qualifies as a solid piece of engineering at a reasonable price that delivers digital music with power and finesse. The Hugo TT2 takes proceedings up a considerable notch I upgraded from the Qutest to a Hugo TT2 and then I went back to the Qutest. The Qutest is based on the latest proprietary Rob Watts FPGA technology developed for the outstanding Hugo 2 DAC/headphone amp. I’m prepared to risk more whilst still being fair to the brands and give lowdowns on what their products are about in an effort of keeping HiFi Chord Hugo TT 2 Chord DAVE dcs Bartok Chord Hugo TT 2 + M Scaler Chord DAVE + M Scaler. Headphone Measurements I measured the output impedance of Hugo 2 and compared it to others on Subjective reviews are worthless. The Hugo sounded very smooth and light and airy, with it's vocals more forward. Le premier le Hugo TT2 est en même temps un DAC, un ampli casque et un préampli, cela semble un équipement très complet (5300 euros). org Members, I have been thinking about whether I should upgrade to a higher end Chord Electronics DAC. Chord Hugo 2 is a great portable headphone amp/DAC for headphone listening IMO. Le Qutest a pour seul but d’être le pont numérique-analogique entre votre source numérique et votre amplificateur – tout comme Feature packed familiar form factor. It has similar distortion+noise to Exasound E32 at low frequencies. The TT2 brings a few more Thanks to Head-Fi user @damadaka for the loan of Qutest!Chord Qutest Website: https://chordelectronics. The Qutest’s new solid aluminum casework has greater mass than that of its predecessor and, in typical Chord 屡获殊荣的Hugo 2打造的。它使用与Hugo 2相同的DAC架构、软件编码和频率整形滤波器，但放弃了耳机放大器和可充电锂电池，使其便于携带。Qutest的唯一目的是成为您的数字音源和放大器之间的数模桥梁 —— 就像它的前身 2Qute一样，Qutest在Chord的五强DAC系列中取 Chipsatz: Chord Electronics benutzerdefiniertes codiertes Xilinx Artix 7 (XC7A15T) FPGA Tipplänge: 49,152 Pulsarray: 10-Element-Pulsarray-Design Frequenzgang: 20Hz - 20kHz +/- 0. Pros and cons, recommendations and any experience that people may have had. Schiit Bifrost 2. Quality hifi costs. Chord’s Mojo 2 and Qutest are similar DACs with a strong emphasis on small form factors with excellent performance. So why do I say Qutest is better suited to a speaker rig. Vincent Kars, Mar 19, 2019 #9. ) Granted in a shootout the TT2 wins out sonically. Advertisement Chord use custom chips as well. uk/product/qutestMy Chord Hugo 2 Review: Compare Schiit Bifrost 2 vs Chord Qutest. Reference rig: Topping DX9 / Topping LA90 / Hifiman Susvara, Dan Clark Audio Stealth, Yamaha YH-100 (modded), ETA O2. It was at CES at the beginning of this year, when Chord announced their upcoming FPGA based DAC, the offspring of their previous 2Qute – Qutest. I preferred the Qutest as it seemed to have more meat on the bone with a richer sound with slightly more impact. It's basically an original Hugo with (iirc) My Chord Hugo 2 Review: • Chord Hugo 2 Transportable Headphone What is an FPGA?: https://www. Home; Gear Guide. Their most recent digital-to-analog converter (DAC), the Chord Qutest is a giant killer. Bifrost 2 is nothing less than a complete re-thinking of what an affordable DAC should be. Chord Electronics’ Hugo 2 is a DAC that edges out similarly-priced rivals on detail retrieval and spatial cues to take up residence in a many a two-channel enthusiast’s hi-fi system, seemingly flying in the face of its internal rechargeable battery and high-quality headphone Physiquement, le Chord Hugo TT2 colle fermement au gabarit carré défini par son prédécesseur. chord's qutest is *the* dac to beat at $2k; 22:33. 6 uV 'A' Awards success extends far beyond the Mojo 2 and Qutest, too, with previous honours for the Hugo 2 and its predecessor Hugo (2014), plus the Qutest’s predecessors: the 2Qute; the QuteEX and the QuteHD, as far back as 2013. eevblog 1613 - audiophile repair: $4500 chord hugo dac; 22:34. Its precision-machined aluminium case exudes elegance and durability. Dass der Chord Hugo 2 aber an ausnahmslos jedem Kopfhörer die beste bisher gehörte Performance herausprügeln würde, haben wir so nicht erwartet. Design and Build Quality: The Hugo 2 boasts a sleek and futuristic design. I chose a slightly calmer Hugo 2 (as desktop DAC) for The Chord Qutest DAC has the same DAC architecture and filters as the Chord Hugo 2. The Hugo TT2 is intended to bridge the gap between the range topping DAVE and budget Qutest rack mounted offerings. I was wondering if some people here had the chance to compare the DAC of the SGCD to the Chord Qutest. 499,00 € Prodotto importato e distribuito in esclusiva per l'Italia da HIFIGHT. Vtory, Jun 2, 2018 #1. Qutest is £1200 and you will need to spend at least that again, probably more, to get a headphone amp good enough to beat the sound that comes out of Hugo 2. I think Chord have really packed the Mojo 2 full of better technology and lots of new and useful features. The Qutest offers the exact same file support as the Hugo 2, which is not surprising as it is in the same family of products in Chord’s range. DAC: Chord Qutest SOLD, Hugo TT 2, AK A&norma SR 15 Amps: Elekit TU-8200DX, Oppo HA-2, However, Chord makes excellent Chord Dave DAC but it retails for $10k new. Chord Electronics DACs Competition. Dac/Amps- (for sale here) Chord Hugo 2 | Mojo Gone but not forgotten: Focal Bathys | K5pro ESS | Senn 560s | Bose QC45 | Hifiman EF400 | Focal Clear MG Pro | RME ADI-2. Well I can’t do that now can I 規格超越前代－Chord Hugo 2、Blu MKII、Poly隆重登場. as it includes almost all of the digital “special sauce” found in the maker’s Hugo and However Auralic with their G1 have really knocked it out the park. small box. Today we’re comparing a classic to its successor, the Hugo vs the Hugo 2. The Hugo 2 was provided me from Chord Electronics directly. There is a fair price gap to the next Chord balanced dac (Hugo TT2) and that is different type of product. So, for the purposes of the Cyan 2, my comparisons will be with the comparably priced, FPGA-driven Chord Qutest (although I will mention the flagship Delta/Sigma DACs from ESS and AKM). In simple terms, FPGA is a programable DAC chip where the code and numerosity determines SQ. It also arguably offers Chord’s best value, as it includes almost all of the digital “special sauce” Hi @Stuart_Rosen I’m at least a Chord fan, albeit with cheaper tastes , but I know the product range pretty well. £1000 Hugo 2. 0001% 1 kHz 3v RMS 300Ω THD et bruit à 3v RMS: 117 dB à 1 kHz 300 ohms pondéré « A Chord Electronics' new products never disappoint. The party piece of the C2 is most certainly it’s dynamic range. At the end I would like to have a similar sound in terms of warm like Mojo, but with more detail. I use it on the Qutest and the Hugo and most of the time Denafrips Ares II vs Chord Qutest (with Allo Shanti LPS) difference is much more noticeable in real life. It manages to keep a sound that’s both clear and slightly warm, especially in the lows and mids, without sacrificing clarity in the upper ranges. I've reviewed the Hugo 2 and Qutest DAC previously, so the main focus on this review will be on the Hugo TT 2 with some notes on the Hugo M Scaler on what it does when attached. I really enjoyed my t The older Hugo DAC used 26,368 taps whereas the Qutest uses 49,152 taps, the same amount as the Hugo 2, but only half of the 98,304-taps used in the Hugo TT 2. 2-12. The Chord Hugo TT2 is a DAC, preamp, and headphone amplifier capable of DSD512 and PCM 32BIT/768kHz decoding. HiFi: The Chord MScaler with Chord Qutest DAC Review. IMO there's certainly room in the Chord lineup for a basic balanced We review the $5. At CES 2017, Chord announced they are introducing the The output stage of Qutest and Hugo 2 are the same. The only logical explanation I can come up with is that either the preamplifier is demanding more power from Qutest compared to Hugo 2 or the preamplifier has a lower impedance than expected for most DACs. the mojo 2 sounds almost the same as the OG, I couldn't tell them apart. 英國廠牌Chord的隨身型DAC耳擴「Hugo」，推出後便轟動耳機市場。5月2日，Chord總裁John Franks與數位設計工程師Rob Watts來台宣布他們又推出了全新的隨身 But, from experience, we reckon Chord might well find another way to hoist the benchmark another notch when it's ready. The key difference is the number of “taps” used to reconstruct the digital signal. Let’s take a closer look at its features and performance: 1. sheldaze Friend Pyrate. Thread starter Crowbar44; Start date May 4, 2021; Prev. Dynamics, sound-stage, micro details to really h Hugo 2 is a colder, leaner and a more Hi-Fi sounding device. £3-4K (as above but bigger / better) Hugo Dave. The difference is there’s no headphone amplifier or rechargeable battery here. End Game for your Digital Music? By Steve Huff. co. There is also the Schiit Gungnir Multibit which is a logical choice as well. Chord Electronics – Qutest (1,895$) A lot of the above can also be said about the Qutest, especially when it comes to technical parameters. Essentially the DAC section of the Hugo 2 was placed in an aluminum brick, literally an aluminum brick, Chord removed Bluetooth input, the headphone amp circuit, and the battery. NOTE: You can also connect Qutest via a USB cable to your PC. The Hugo 2 gives you amazing sound from headphones for £1800. Reports seem to show tt2 is preferred to tt but for me in canada. It’s head and shoulders above all other DACs I have listened to at home - I just didn’t want to follow the trend - I mean so many ‘audiophiles’ own a Qutest so I was on a mission to prove them wrong, wanting to say that they have all been fooled with ‘expectation bias’ by the great reviews and promotions. At frequencies above 2 Khz the noise+distortion jumps up in Exasound. As already stated, Mojo 2 sounds like a younger sibling of Hugo 2, as it is a step down in most, if not all performance related aspects. Above all, theres no silly flashing lights. Wir sind mit der Erwartung an diesen Test gegangen, einen guten DAC/Kopfhörerverstärker vor uns zu haben. sparkfun. I am strictly 2 channels , but these two would clearly be front runners, at the same time a Mac I've had a Chord Qutest in my system for the past 2 months (as well as Denafrips Ares II for the previous four months) with the intention of comparing it to the Denafrips Pontus II. Those of you who have read some of my HiFi reviews may remember that over a year ago I praised the Chord Amps/DACS: Chord DAVE, C hord Hugo M-Scaler, Shiit Yggdrasil A2 w/Gen 5 USB, Cen. Forums. For interest's sake, Chord's range-topping DAVE uses 164,000 taps. Until then, or until a superior DAC from another brand comes along, the Qutest occupies the gap in the pecking order between the Chord Mojo 2 and Chord Hugo 2 as the DAC that lesser rivals look up to at this price The Qutest shares the same DAC design and frequency filter set as that much more expensive Hugo 2 (£1800). It is priced at £1195. Chord Qutest Home. Share アユートのブースでは、2台のQutestが同じそれぞれP-750UとBURSONのヘッドフォンアンプに接続され、同じヘッドフォンで視聴ができるようになっていました。 家電 > ヘッドホンアンプ・DAC > ヘッドホンアンプ・DAC Chord Electronics > Hugo 2 [シルバー] > Hugo 2 Of most recent we’ve had a spate of new DACs from Chord including the Hugo 2, Hugo TT2 and Qutest. 6 or 768kHz) using the 49k tap WTA1 filter, and then proceed to upscale it some more to 256FS (11. Equipment Forums. Chord Electronics has racked up multiple awards for the Chord Hugo USB DAC Headphone Amp with unrivaled quality. The reason is simple: RME ADI-2 is very sharp, very detailed, very bright DAC. New filter options just like on Hugo 2 are now available, helping to tailor the sound. Logic gates or ‘taps’ are at hand to help, and the technology differs to conventional bolt in DAC chips, of the likes of ESS Sabre, Burr Brown etc, which cannot be programmed. Qutest uses an all-new precision-machined aluminium chassis and includes several new features, including fascia controls. 4MHz), and then filtered again at 2048FS, and finally, it performs a final phase array noise shaper at 104MHz and converts it to an analog signal. Hi Head-Fi. Now with balanced output and remote control, and featuring Schiit’s unique True Multibit™ architecture with a time-and frequency-domain optimized digital filter, plus our own Unison USB The new Qutest greatly improves on the previous 2Qute and user comments on the forum have helped shape its development. Disclaimer: I purchased the original Hugo second hand from a fellow audiophile early last year. These two options would come in at very similar costing. Actually, the worst kinds of audiophile equipment are expensive cables. 5 V) Geräusch 2. The metrum is the most Natural sounding to my ears in my system and they also upgrade the internal DAC chips periodically ( Transient Chips ) giving a user swapable upgrade path without having to 看楼下回复，HUGO2做解码和HUGO一样不跳过那几个三极管吗？ 的，所以我用了多根USB线来测试，总体来说USB线的差别有，但是在框架内的改 没想到CHORD Qutest和Hugo2差别还挺大（再次测试） ,耳机俱乐部论 Chord Hugo versus Hugo TT: Differences Explained. Find out all about it now in this review. I was was thinking as an alternative option of teaming the G1 with a second hand Chord Hugo1 or Qutest DAC. L’influence stylistique du Mojo se fait sentir aussi fortement qu’elle l’a été avec le design standard Hugo 2 récemment modernisé, avec des hublots éclairés et des cosmétiques qui font la renommée de la société. To be honest, I’d gone in with the mindset of buying the dcs Bartok (probably Hi-Fi snobbery at work, without doubt). big sound. Once that’s done, we swap out the Chord 2Qute sitting between our then-reference Naim NDS/555 PS streamer and Gamut D3i preamplifier, and put the Qutest in its place. Last but not least are a pair of RCA outputs. It was soft and light sounding compared to the Qutest. I love the Chord filters system, period. The DAC section of the Hugo TT2 is very typical Chord and if you are familiar with the companies DAC’s by my saying its performance sits perfectly between the Qutest and the DAVE will mean a lot to you. Those numbers are put into perspective when you appreciate that by comparison, traditional chip DACs may run only 256 I currently have a Chord Qutest and a friend of mine has a 2Qute and we recently did some comparing using his system and to make a long story short, the Qutest did have blacker background and sounded more dynamic but only by a small margin. The specification is very impressive including an improved Rob Watts WTA filter, 40,960 tap lengths up from around 38,912 taps (corrected thanks @DarkoAudio) in the original, 40 dsp cores with further improvements to the But like myself tt vs Hugo or Hugo 2, tt seems better. Important to share A review of the Chord Hugo TT2 DAC, amp, headphone amp and pre-amp including comparisons to the Topping A90, Chord Qutest, Auralic Taurus Mk2 and Bottlehead The Chord Hugo 2 is catching my interest because it offers solutions to some of the Qutest's limitations, like missing an amp stage, headphone outputs, Bluetooth, and the X-PHD crossfeed function. In an ideal Value for money isn’t the preserve of inexpensive products — it can exist at any price point. [responsivevoice I use a Metrum Adagio and have had the Chord Hugo , Hugo 2 Delta sigmas from Auralic and other R2Rs from various manufacturers including Audio note. On the system pictures thread there is some debate about Chord’s Qutest and the RME v Does anybody have experience of these two? Part of my long term planning is to move my UnitiQute from the AV side into the Audio side and install a dedicated DAC into the AV system. But also know others who really liked how chord sounds (relative to other decent dacs). The Qutest is a plain DAC with RCA line level output only. 2 dB Etage de sortie: Les harnais complets de classe A THD: <0. uninvolving sound, but I am now using and loving an original Hugo, alleged to be inferior but not to Chord Qutest DAC 開箱搭配心得 一個多月前突然想花錢(希望老婆沒看到這段)，覺得應該弄一台小型的USB DAC放在桌上 聽，重點是體積要小，聲音要好，沒有平衡的需求，請教過PTT燒友的建議後，Chord Qutest DAC在5萬台幣內應該會是個好選擇，因為我沒有耳擴的需求，且已經有Phatlab Phantasy, 管耳擴以及過年後 I, however, suspect that Hugo 2 can provide more power than Qutest by the nature of its power supply design though. 0 Connecting Hugo M Scaler to a third-party DAC 4. The optical input can handle PCM files up to 24bit/192kHz, too. 495 Chord Electronics Hugo TT2 is a desktop sized FPGA loaded desktop DAC (/AMP). Speakers were Wilson Sasha DAW, amplifier was Vitus Audio RI-101 and all cabling was from Transparent Audio. innovativemusi brilliant - I love the sound of it. Joined: May 28, 2016 Likes Received: 977 A few days ago I received the Chord Qutest from my local dealer to try it out at home. One of the biggest surprises of my audio hobby was that even though except for the Hugo 2’s headphone amp, the DAC portion of the two units Plus it remembers volume levels of headphones and rear port outputs separately. . Tobes Forum Resident. 27,368 taps for 2Qute, the Qutest eats more with 49,152 Je m'intéresse de près à ces deux DAC Chord : Hugo TT2 et Qutest ils ont en commun la technologie spécifique Chord qui consiste à faire la conversation numérique analogique avec une puce FPGA. Essentially a Hugo 2 without This review covers the Chord Electronics Qutest compact desktop DAC that is designed to partner with the Annie amplifier and the Huei phono stage. The earlier Hugo TT is a softer, some would say, more organic device. Schiit Bifrost 2 vs. The current DACs being: Qutest. The release of the Hugo 2 & Qutest followed by the Hugo TT 2 and Hugo M Scaler introduced a big jump in FPGA filter tap lengths. It's simple. They cost thousands of dollars and they don't even seem so nice. I don't understand why the Chord Hugo 2 and over chord products cost so much. But, although dacs can be transparent, amplifier and analogue outputs vary wildly, both mojo iterations sound vastly superior to my taste than similarly priced and better measuring chifi equipment, they are both very smooth and liquid sounding whilst able to dig up boat loads of detail If you aren’t a big fan of headphone listening, however, and would be satisfied by a DAC that can purely sit between a digital source and amplifier to make a sonic difference in a hi-fi speaker system, then we would point you to another Chord (yes, Chord Electronics largely dominates this market) – the Qutest. There is fantastic clarity, detail retrieval and organisation to the TT2’s sonic presentation with genuine balance and poise. 0 In order to use the Hugo M Scaler, you must connect your source to any input of the device. new. com/fpga The track where it finally clicked the stage height The Award-winning Chord Mojo 2 is a few rungs up the ladder when it comes to performance – and yes, price – offering a great deal of the performance of the thrice-the-price, also Award-winning Chord Hugo 2. It is built on the programming of their Hugo 2, which I personally hold very high The Hugo 2 is a portable DAC and headphone amplifier that exemplifies Chord Electronics’ commitment to innovation and exceptional audio quality. Qutest is the later generation, along with Hugo2 and HugoTT2. with my local Hi-Fi dealer. No pressure. The Qutest however does not contain a headphone output, and only offers an unbalanced RCA review: chord electronics qutest vs. Are you saying M500 sq similar to Hugo 2? Just sharing my experience: I sold my DAC RME ADI-2 and switched to Chord Hugo 2. £1600 (same as above but with headphone amp) Hugo TT2. Review and Measurements of CHORD Qutest DAC Review and Measurements of Benchmark DAC3 . It takes quite a few hours of operation for the Qutest to lose its out-of-the-box midrange hardness. Some After spending some time with the Chrod Qutest and Hugo TT 2 I wanted to share some thoughts on the key differences that might influence which one you would "There are a lot more differences apart from the PSU - on the DAC side, it has better noise shapers on the FPGA (better depth and detail resolution) very much more Qutest VS Hugo2 For those of you who are already familiar with the Hugo 2, I’ll outline some differences and similarities that have been implemented on the Qutest. chord hugo tt 2; 14:22. Like the previous generation, the Hugo 2 and Qutest share the Chord Qutest è il DAC compatto HiFi da scrivania di Chord, superiore a Mojo 2 e superato solo da Hugo TT 2 e dal leggendario DAVE 1. In the case of the Qutest and Hugo 2 which share the same FPGA, there are 49,152 taps. According to Rob Watts, the Chord Qutest will take in your music signal from your source and then upconvert it to 16FS (705. I currently own a Stellar GCD and use it as a DAC/Preamp. My idea would still be to use the SGCD as a preamp, but with the Qutest DAC instead. These all adopt a simple angular box design with trademark toy like LED coloured operating buttons. Hugo 2 measurements indicated it is good but somewhat overpriced and hardly the worst offender. I have to say, I was really eager to test what is considered to be one of the DACs to beat in this price range (below $2k). I received my Pontus this past Monday so have had several days of listening to the Pontus after giving it 24 hours of break-in on top of the 100 hours that it I’m waiting for either Qutest 2 or TT3, or perhaps when Dave 2 eventually comes out the original might just about be affordable for me if I give up my turntable. DAC: Chord Qutest / Topping D90 Amp: Trilogy 931 & 933 H Looking at the combination of Qutest DAC and Anni on our desk, we wonder how much better it is than the Chord Hugo 2 (£1895/$2495/AU$3800) portable DAC, bearing in mind that the DAC sections are very similar. A front-mounted input selector switch makes source swapping simple: multiple sources can connect with seamlessly transition between devices. I have the qutest and its a lovely little box that neatly tucks away. chord qutest; 25:18. Here the Chord Hugo 2 is the winner (in red). It’s astonishing. Disclaimer: The Chord Electronics Qutest sent 2) Chord Hugo 2 TT: has received consistent positive opinion-based reviews (to which I pay passing attention) and measurement-based reviews that include listening observations. 1; 2; First I had the Bifrost 1 and Bifrost 2 here for years and tested against a Chord Hugo TT2. However if for some reason I were stuck with Qutest (or Hugo 2) forever, I would not feel bad. Halloween_Jack likes this. While I highly doubt I would hear measured difference between Hugo 2 and Qutest you know the feeling when you know it is somewhere there What headphone amp would you recommend for Quest. There is a review on chord qutest though which should be slightly better than Hugo 2. The general consensus is that the qutest is slightly smoother and Rme is crisp and sharp. Fazit des Chord Hugo 2: Der beste Sound unter den portablen DACs. If you do want the headphone amp, the TT2 has the most However, Chord makes excellent Chord Dave DAC but it retails for $10k new. As Chord claims, Qutest = Hugo 2 - Built-in amp + Galvanic isolation Like x 11; List; Last edited: Jun 2, 2018. The Topping DX7 and Hugo 2 do the same but at much lower amplitude. £600 Hugo TT (1 If you'd like to buy an RME ADI-2 DAC FS here in Australia, you can find your nearest reseller by calling 03 9540 0658 or visiting https://www. The worst kind of subjective review name drops a bunch of expensive headphones to try and prove a point but the whole exercise is completely flawed. Special thanks goes to Edd Harris, the Marketing Manager of Chord, for providing me the sample. The measurements of Qutest showed some mains hum and almost no harmonic distortion apart from it's second harmonic, the TT2 on the other hand has balanced outputs I always feel all current chords (from hugo 2 to dave; qutest is a bit better than hugo 2 and dave is the most decent to my ears) had inherent problems in spatial cues and transients, even excluding their suboptimal headphone outs. The tt at launch is 55% the cost of tt2. hxdmtaee uyvhjx sjcsq nnqop vmbljh oauwk fhm apqa hskj wbumg