Vsan vs nutanix reddit. it was problematic for us.

Vsan vs nutanix reddit. That being said new company also has Nutanix.

Vsan vs nutanix reddit Since Nutanix charges more for RAM used and SSDs used? " Wanted to buy memory for some Dell XC servers with Nutanix Pro licenses. Nimble for VDI Project . nutanix vs nvidia vs C3AI Internship Question I am looking for higher chance of return offer. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes The vSAN cluster is Cascade Lake, using Cisco UCS m5s. I equate them to Windows Mostly, it was just really expensive for what it is compared to either Nutanix or vSAN ready nodes. Just overall poor performance, especially compared to vsan. 6 powered cluster. Nutanix runs rings around vSAN. Because you'll need quite a few slots to fit all that Simplicity is the most expensive (50k difference between hypercovered high end and low end, so at the level we are talking no real difference. The solution is straightforward and reliable, and the Starwind support team does a fantastic job at setting things up. When we’ll get 72 core Xeons in Dells and in-line dedupe within VSAN early next year? Nutanix gives you a choice of using other hypervisors. Thanks for the insight. The difference if that VxRail includes an automation engine developed with Vmware wrapped around the node. Hi, hoping this reddit can help. Nutanix has some advantages in their products as they developed them more recently. " A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. There’s no storage VM to maintain. Had to pay more than double in "Nutanix software licenses" than if I just bought the memory for a regular R730 server - even though the memory has the exact same part number No, VSAN is a cluster level construct that works across a cluster to protect data. other platforms . Nutanix vs. I currently run several vSAN clusters in production, I would love some feedback regarding Choosing between Nutanix AHV and VMware vSAN depends on various factors, including existing infrastructure, management preferences, and specific workload Most of our server infrastructure lives in nutanix and their version of vsan is so much better. In general, you'll find quite a bit of content with a search on reddit, as there's been quite a few threads about Nutanix. Nutanix you pay one (licensing)price and get it all. As mentioned, Nutanix is KVM under the hood, so you can easily migrate to any KVM-based solution. Not that the wallet should drive everything, but yeah we all have budgets to stick to. Better support, stronger companies, pricing however may be a little more for Dell vs. I would agree about vendor lock. Usable Capacity Comparison – Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. They have a Type-1 Hypervisor, AVH, seems to be based off of KVM/QEMU. I just think the fancy vSAN/Nutanix style compute/storage model is overkill for file server storage. As we speak I am converting over some of our Hyper-V servers. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Nutanix's warranty/Equipment is almost EOL and the VSAN isn't setup right and doesn't do mixed mode or dedicated storage. spdrweb8 Since Nutanix charges more for RAM used and SSDs used? " Wanted to buy memory for some Dell XC servers with Nutanix Pro licenses. This Reddit is aimed at the education and support for the community. Also, a robust alternative is the StarWind HCA solution. As much as I love VSAN and Nutanix, the reality is that HCI solutions aren't that cost effective for smaller environments due to the license cost. When you compare vSAN vs Nutanix pools & containers it's not really a direct comparison. Had to pay more than double in "Nutanix software licenses" than if I just bought the memory for a regular R730 server - even though the memory has the exact same part number Sorry for the delay. View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. With ~$27k/y license cost (iirc). you can do direct connect fiber on the nodes and youre' done. Nutanix was another solution, but surprisingly, it would have cost us more. Cons - Nutanix is more flexible, interact with others hipervisors (XEN and Hyper-V) Pros - vSAN is compatible with In my opinion, the biggest difference between Nutanix and VMware vSAN is flexibility and choice. vSAN ESA vs Nutanix AOS upvotes · Compare Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure vs VMware vSAN. I manage both vsan and nutanix(on esxi) and management of the cluster on vsan is significantly easier. Buildout #1 went Hyper-V, and I used StarWinds vSAN because even though adapters/HBAs were on the MS HCL, they didn't get recognized as such with S2D, even when cross-flashed to IT mode. if vsan, add $10K for a switch they'll rec'd on their HCL (broadcomm, cisco, hpe, etc). Cost-effective solution with a great support team. If you're thinking about moving from vmware hypervisor, give Nutanix a try. If you use the GUI you get a trail license which does not revert to free after 30 days. Dell owns 80% of VMware. Can Hyper-V run on S2D clustered storage? Yes, but you have to create everything manually first. I’ve seen many performance issues solved (on VSAN and Nutanix) solved by moving from a low cost edge 10G switch to a more data center centric 10G switch. Free is CLI only. vSAN was the first solution that came to mind. Nutanix nodes can be configured with less storage hardware But I could share one key finding is a difference in write path: vSAN does NOT stripe the data(not by default and if forced to do it - there are some significant limitations). I'm not saying VSAN has the features that Nutanix does though. Does SQL server Failover-clusters support CIFS now instead of iSCSI for the SQL data and witness disks? I haven't done the research for a long time, we use iSCSI or the vSAN native feature, the latter stops us from snapshoting the VM's tho so an alternative would be nice. I tried migrating to oVirt and Proxmox. Teddy has a video about it here. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break Nutanix vs. They are more flexible and cheaper. ~4000 IOPS @ 0. They are hypervisor agnostic but they do offer their own. It replicates the storage between hosts and presents it as the iSCSI target. " Why not throw Dell, HP and EMC EVO:RAIL appliances in the mix? Trying to decide between Nutanix, Hyper-V/S2D and VMware vSphere/vSAN . There is no reason you can't use vsan, it works well and if you can design it properly, it works great, if you don't, it runs like crap. Nutanix involves running a "software controller" on the server as a virtual machine, and using spare resources on that same server to host other workloads. If you go to Nutanix you are looking at $90k - $120k. The size varies from small branch offices with 1-3 hosts and vSAN to larger 10-20 node clusters, stretched with mirrored FC block storage (1 PB overall currently). OpenStack vs. It's based on their VSAN technology, utilizes Dell servers, and provides decent support at both hardware and software levels. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the Nutanix ain’t half bad. 0. No question. VSAN w/ Dell Hardware and ROBO licenses beat Nutanix iii) Drawbacks to vSAN is how quickily you can rebuild datachunks. I don't love vsan, we use it, but id rather just have some 3rd party array. At 20TB vSAN might totally kill you if you weren't planning to replace your hosts. comment sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment [deleted] • Additional comment actions Nutanix in San Jose, California offers their software-defined Enterprise Cloud as a hyper-converged infrastructure solution. For immediate help Between the two options, I would choose Nutanix. Nutanix does that for you, and you can add nodes of varying sizes and it orchestrates them all. MS Exchange Performance - Nutanix vs VSAN 6. The management to it must be impossible, I helped set up the VMs for the management, and we had to set up virtual clusters within clusters, because they refused to be installed on anything but empty servers. This enables companies to focus on successful business outcomes and new innovations. Members Online. Read the rules before posting! A community dedicated to discussion of VMware products and services Been a VMware guy since 3. Nutanix ADSF enjoys data locality by design, not by luck. Nutanix is "Hyper-Converged" in it's approach to building the datacenter fabric - meaning the compute and the storage tier are no longer separate sets of servers, but are one and the same. I was looking at VSAN and kept coming across articles published by VMWare saying that their solution is $140k cheaper than Nutanix. Top tier support from Nutanix too. ) Nutanix the lack of hardware card accelerator worries me that it relays on software and may not preform as well but a good point earlier about how yo then have a single point of a failure. joshodgers All I can think of when I hear the name Nutanix is the battles you fought on Twitter and on discussion forums, the negativity, nutanix vs nvidia vs C3AI Internship Question I am looking for higher chance of return offer. Yes you would get more functions and features from Nutanix but you also get more cost. If a node fails, vmware ha kicks in and restarts the vm's, just like vsan would so no difference there. You didn't state how much storage you need, also did you consider vSAN? Is converged going to cause you any maintenance issues with having only the minimum number of hosts? Nutanix doesn't make much cost sense without also going with their hypervisor, have you looked at the difference vs VMware ? Do you leverage any VMware specific features? Here's the main low down between the two. If I were building a data center today, I'd build it on Nutanix. A subreddit dedicated to news and discussions about VMware hypervisor - awesome. It is nice, but it is still have issues, so we prefer to deploy VMware vSAN for most of our cutsomers. Each has a dual 40gb MLOM, which one of the ports is presented to the OS as 4 vNICs (vSAN, vMotion, VM traffic and iSCSI traffic). Nutanix ADSF delivers a consistent write path regardless of where a VM resides or is moved to within a cluster. For the same cost as an HCI solution, you could get a far more resilient and better performing traditional SAN. Nutanix uses an iSCSI container and advertises the storage as NFS4 (NFS3 if you choose that) so ALL nodes use the storage from all nodes. We got a customer who's a bank with around 50 branches in the area. Welcome to the IPv6 community We use Citrix & Nutanix. AKA Move the File Shares on Windows, Nutanix, and VSAN to NetApp AFF C400 system. When considering the effect a single disk failing has on a vSAN cluster vs a Nutanix cluster I would not trust critical workloads on vSAN. 2), with a bunch of products stitched together to make it work. In this post, we compare VMware and Nutanix, highlighting their features, strengths, and weaknesses to help IT managers make an informed decision about the best infrastructure for their organization. That being said new company also has Nutanix. VMware vs nutanix pricing comments. Both clusters are Gen5, so end of support by early next year (with an extension from Nutanix). Nutanix allows you the flexibility The one advantage of Nutanix is it own hypervisor. I hope it gets there though, would be nice to have another open source option alternative to something like VMware ESXi + VSAN or Nutanix. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. Azure/Vsan/vxrail does have a cluster cap. The latest version of Nutanix doesn't like the gen7 NUCs at all. Nutanix isn't just a hypervisor. Gonna redo my vSan lab to Nutanix AHV so i thought i post a picture before i kill it . For our Like most of us vmware admins, I am currently evaluating a post VMware Future at my company. You might find this direct comparison between Nutanix and Simplivity on IT Central Station to be helpful: Users interested in these two solutions also read reviews for VMware VSAN. Starwinds VSAN is a great option for 2-3 node deployments. vSAN ESA vs Nutanix AOS upvotes · . Nutanix's biggest competiton from a revenue/install base perspective is VSAN actually. r/vmware. I have built 50 servers on our Nutanix cluster running AHV and everything including HA works just fine. (Post will be removed) Keep it civil. 0) is new, and is based off of VSAN 6. Lose an entire disk group. I posted in a separate section of this thread with some comparisons from my PoV a Nutanix purchase means one number to call for support instead of cross-vendor finger pointing and slowdowns. Their arguments always amounted to “well in VMware I” even with features that had full parity. Maybe a NetApp/NAS, if that's more your style. HP StoreVirtual is compatible with Hyper-V, VMWare, Xen and I believe even KVM now. It's great! It works as advertised, great performance, easy to manage. we moved away from Nutanix, we had a few environments of it. There's too much going on. VSAN will lock you in to VMWare. Nutanix is just to manage and distribute the storage. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. 2-3 node storage clusters are better with something like Starwinds vSAN. VxRail 4. I had the same experience with a recent install. I personally wouldn't trade VMware for Nutanix unless you really want a Nutanix exclusive feature. If I had my way, and $$$, I would have Nutanix at all sites, setup DR replication (latency permitting) etc. With HP Nutanix can push their hypervisor. Taking into account 3-2-1 rule in terms how data should be stored, please take to consideration VSAN+DRS. To be honest at the performance levels achieved the constraint is usable capacity not IOPS, so more performance would be somewhat redundant for Exchange. An unofficial forum of owners and enthusiasts of the Blitz. VMware and Nutanix both offer very similar things. Current HCI stack is a 4 node Nutanix cluster, with an identical cluster in a colo. We also use Nutanix in prod too the deployment it's super easy and their support, lifecycle management, analytics and stability is way better than VMware's vSAN. After some demo calls, they went with Starwind. Right now, they're satisfied. The largest Opel community on Reddit. Most do light office work, some need light audio-visual support (watch YouTube and clipart animations). You might also find real user reviews for VMware vSAN and Nutanix on IT Central Station to be helpful. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. Nutanix ADSFs worst case scenario of two write replicas being sent remotely (during maintenance or CVM failure) is a typical scenario fo vSAN. I’ve been using vsan in a shared network environment and I’ve had more trouble with iSCSI San than vsan. Nutanix has a number of different products that fit into various different places of a virtualization environment. If not just get a regular FC SAN - so much more flexible. I like that I don't have to be a storage engineer with it. This keeps you within the ecosystem without running up the costs in a crazy way. It was pretty cool at the time, but you have to sacrifice a lot of resources to the manager VM, which could take 30% of host recourse. I've not gotten hands on with AHV yet, but my understanding is it's probably at the same level as ESX 4 right now, still very much playing catch up. Vsan has some advantages for running in the hyper visor instead of running as a storage vm. Storage, compute, networking, and virtualization, together in one platform defined by cloud-scale Still Nutanix sales had no clue about SMB 3. On the simple side. But catch up it will. Lenovo 4 920q i5-8500 64gb. Netapp AFF SAN, Brocade FC versus Nutanix/SuperMicro w/ NCM Pro license) and the costs were similar. If you want to test SDS solutions, something like Nutanix, Ceph, VMware vSAN, or S2D is better starting from 4 nodes. I talked to ex-marine guy and young Indian with brackets and horrible accent. i came to the personal conclusion that if I was willing to ditch We are moving FROM nutanix to vSAN, mostly due to renewal and license costs. but i did a direct comparison of Nutanix vs a regular 1-2-3 infrastrucutre using a leading array vendor a while back. practicalzfs. I haven't gone back and revisited it yet. They were choosing between VXRail, Nutanix, and Starwind HCA. Lenovo. Reply reply As an official Fidelity customer care channel, our community is the best way to get help on Reddit with your questions about investing with Fidelity – directly from Fidelity Associates. I moved jobs and the new place had moved from VMware to Nutanix, also with some VMware on Nutanix. Basically. I have experience with Cisco HX, vSAN ReadyNode on dell hardware, and Nutanix. The only HCI I've personally had positive experiences with, mostly because I wasn't footing the bill, was Nutanix, and even that was going downhill last I Nutanix has a range of hardware you can use, their own version of KVM with added features (you can scrap VMware licensing) or even go with Hyper-V, SimpliVity benefits from ASIC offloading gets better dedupe/compression ratios cannot do KVM or Hyper-V must be dual CPU and All Flash, vxRail is just DELL/EMC packaged VSAN with a little special With a ~$3k/y license cost. The officially unofficial VMware community on Reddit. Erasure Coding Comparison – Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. It got a lot of hate from the guys that were mediocre at VMware, mostly due to change. We use Veeam B&R to backup VMs and we are happy with it. IMHO, vSAN doesn't do a great job in rebuilding VMs as quickly enough as some of the other HCI's out here (Nutanix and Scale Computing). VSAN is very simple to manage when it comes to updates. com with Tackle file services first. I work for a VAR and a client is evaluating Cisco HyperFlex vs Nutanix for a 100-250 seat Citrix VDI implementation. This why I find that Nutanix is usually more expensive. We've got ESX running with Nutanix Acropolis, and it's awesome. The customer is a UCS shop (connected to IBM storage) today w about 700 VMs (these are out of scope of this project). VxRail (VSPEX BLUE 2. I did setup Proxmox+Ceph on the NucNucNuc and really enjoyed it. In all both solutions are great I just like the idea of having Nutanix if I wanted to switch the environment from vCenter/ESXi to AHV, Hyper-V or Xen I have that option and they've Or just grab some pizza boxes and make a cluster. It's not to say that VMWare is not expensive but the solutions I would look at, Nutanix was usually more $$. They've got a VSAN-like setup with their Unified Storage, and you can manage it all via Acropolis. . It's very easy to scale. As an example, this Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm writes, "We looked briefly at alternatives, but nothing stood out like vSAN. Acropolis is a great tool, and potentially can We had significantly more experience with Nutanix vs vSAN (like years). 0 being unsupported in the loopback for Hyper-V and were proudly pitching it was Nutanix who they think had invented hyper converged thing. S. With that experience we had streamlined the configuration, management, maintenance, elasticity, etc of our platform. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. vSAN Meh. VSAN 2 node has some improvements now with U2/U3 you can: Lose a host. So make sure you use it all. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. So if you want vSwitch with vSphere you need the right license. Reply Are you using Nutanix hypervisor? How's the general experience? I remember playin with nutanix about 5 years ago when they were building something on top of VMWare or Hyper-V. 1 (not 6. Also, whatever you choose get AMD 32 core CPU hosts to maximize your VMware licensing. I had a call with VMware to discuss the solution but I was a little concerned about the IOPS I would be able to get out of the solution. While VSAN ready nodes are a little more of a build it yourself HCI solution. Nutanix: Turn key solution. I think it is a nice solution, but they've released it as a beta. We are going either with vSAN Ready Nodes or getting server, which are on HCL. It looks very promising but extremely basic in terms of the UI, far from being mainstream yet. I was scanned and now get tons of their marketing BS. 230 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. Been running solid for almost two years without issue. but we found dell servers + vmware + vsan better performing and being more reliable at You might want to look into using Starwind VSAN functionality which supports both Hyper-V and ESXi. The tool to do that could be better but so far it is working with one busted up Hyper-v that wouldn't cooperate. Flash SAN vs vSAN? Or both Even more important, on a Tintri all-flash SAN, or on Nutanix/VSAN, you get performance visibility, QOS, snapshots, cloning and replication all at the VM level. So far HP VSA is more alike VMware VSAN and requires 3-node to setup, I would suggest you to go with StarWind VSAN. Azure stack imo is a very nice setup and I think we gonna see a lot more of it the coming years as it blends in great with Azure itself. It would have been more engineering effort, but I think they should have attempted to use VxFlex/ScaleIO as the storage platform and which would have made more sense. Nutatix Salespeople do promise us similar data replication between two nutanix clusters. vCenter is View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. We're a non-profit SMB with ~250 users spread across 10 sites (3 are ~50 users each) that primarily use Microsoft RDS for connectivity. VSAN spreads objects across disk groups on multiple hosts for availability and performance. Migrated our 65 or so VMs from a Nutanix cluster and haven’t looked back. Nutanix also supports multiple Hypervisors, including VMWare. It shouldn't be hard to use CLI only - there are shell scripts for everything but be careful that you understand what you are doing from the outset - things will go south rather quickly if you just read the documentation as you go along. This all leaves us with a very real problem - Azure Stack HCI and the whole virtualization Nutanix feeds vm's on a host with local io, and if its saturated, then it pulls from the network, reducing latency, and network traffic, and it does provide a bit of a performance bump when compared to an identical setup running vsan, however its not night and day. The Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure solution combines the Nutanix Acropolis virtualization solution, Nutanix AHV hypervisor (though Acropolis works with other hypervisors), Prism cluster manager, Nutanix Calm and Nutanix Flow server management, A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. No hardware replacement is required for 2-node HCL HA setup over C6320 you have. Nutanix is basically expensive replication software, sitting on top of your hardware choice (we went with Supermicro, from Nutanix). This Storage and Virtualization Engineer writes, "As older ESXi hosts are phased out vSAN doesn't perform particularly well (thats being polite) and its not particularly trouble free based on all my experience with it. Zero data loss, and workloads still running. And that leaves you a lot of growth room. Free Hyper-V server is discontinued already and Windows Server 2022 is rumored to be the last one to have Hyper-V role. I actually built a three node NUC cluster, with the intention of testing out Nutanix, which I called the NucNucNuc (for the stooges) Unfortunately, it didn't go well. I would also look into Nutanix Files & FSLogix for a basically all in one VDI environment. Without Nutanix, you'd have to use vSAN for all the nodes in the cluster to see other node(s) storage. (Ok Nutanix has 3 licensing tiers but you still get most things in one package). it was problematic for us. I saw 3 disks fail on a VXRail that dropped a 4 node cluster and support couldn't do a One of the options was VMware vSAN, which works pretty good from my experience. Nutanix is quite expensive licensing wise (so is citrix) but its rock solid. Also Nutanix treats your hardware nodes as appliances, so it's difficult to upgrade ram or storage or With linked clones dedupe isn't quite as important and all of the solutions (VSAN vs XtremIO) are on even footing. While I know VSAN isn't considered HyperConverged it's the baseline architecture towards that type of deployment. joshodgers. Starwinds VSAN is a great option for 2-3 I would consider Hyper-V if you want to go with the node + San setup or azure stack If you want hci. 5 Is shipping currently so with either VSAN solution the end result is going to be a VSAN 6. For immediate help and problem solving Nutanix isn't a plain hypervisor like Hyper-V or ESX, its an HCI orchestrator. vsan needs a dedicated storage switch, starwind does not. I love VMware since I've become experienced with it. Linus Tech Tips - Reddit vs PC Part Picker vs LTT Forum – Where Should YOU Go for We are mostly using VMware vSAN for our deployments. Else, Vsan is a good and robust solution. ESXI and hyper V seem to dominate the market. Cisco and Dell are viable options if you choose to go the Nutanix or VSAN route. Have the witness fail. and the guys who manage it, take FOREVER to get stuff together for us, I have more hands on experience View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. 7K subscribers in the nutanix community. Cisco it will My experience is that Nutanix is more a buy it approach, turn key ready. but it is still have issues, so we prefer to deploy VMware vSAN for most of our cutsomers. They are pushing their hypervisor now. We had a great experience with Starwinds Appliances. On the host level disks are presented directly to hosts as individual disks, and VSAN groups them together into pools of capacity called disk groups. Easy as pie to set up and maintain. They support three: vSphere, Pros - VSAN is integrated in vmkernel, Nutanix ia a VM. Hello all: Hey, you could even go just with vSAN and a traditional SAN pool architecture for the same price point I'm sure really. Nutanix broke up with Dell and got in bed with HP. Other considerations would be cost (HP StoreVirtual due to choice of compute layer) and support (couldn't say personally though I know HP networking product support is Why even use vSAN/HCI these days? SAN storage is so cheap, fast and small why go through the hassle? If you have 50+ nodes and homogeneous web workloads vSAN/HCI is probably a good fit. Also, future licensing concerns with VMWare/Broadcom. 4. Keep in mind that for now, this replication is mainly storage-based, so think VXRail is pre-engineered vSAN with better management. My office simply went with vSAN because VMware gave us a bigger discount to stay with vSphere instead of ditching the software stack all together. VMWare: DIY solution. It is still an issue now? Win, RHEL, SQL, SAP, HANA, Oracle, appliances - just everything. Can you PoC both options? A vSAN cluster bought for PoC can be easily repurposed and no dollars lost, haven't heard of Nutanix RMAs for "didn't like it. I'm pretty sure Nutanix AHV / KVM is a capable hypervisor If you are looking for a cheap storage expansion for file server and archive purposes you may want to look at Nutanix Objects in conjunction with Nutanix Files. Improvements in witness failure handling, the ability to do mirroring inside a host between disk group etc. Nutanix Objects is relatively cheap compared to both Nutanix AOS and other solutions listed in this thread. 5 and certified VCP for 5 and 6. If you want vSan then you buy another license. I haven’t used them but I suspect their cloud and data protection items are a bit easier to work with. I'm not sure why you'd want to ditch vSAN for Nutanix at this point. There aren't a lot of HCI players right now, so that's maybe another factor. P. vSAN requires the VMware Hypervisor. Trusted by companies worldwide, Nutanix powers hybrid multicloud environments efficiently and cost effectively. All your VM's run on ESXi. 134 IOPS a user (assumes 200 messages / day) is almost 30k users per Nutanix node. No linking to product sales, affiliate links, self promotional links, or selling equipment. wbe gbnxf ihrzvza emkjncgh jjt zwfcb hlxmplum twli legnyql suxna